Page 183 - Sport Culture and the Media
P. 183

164  || SPORT, CULTURE AND THE MEDIA


                         and purchase’ (Miller 2001: 56), but there are other unorthodox sports images
                         and their attendant gazes which form part of the changing discourses of
                         identity that are a major feature of contemporary life (Giddens 1991). In sports
                         photography, these involve negotiating the values that surround the body and
                         trying to work through socialized, visceral responses to our own bodies and
                         those of others (Shilling 1993; Falk 1994). Here the optic nerve meets athletic
                         muscle to often discomfiting effect.



                         Variable subject, different gaze

                         The transformations of modernity and postmodernity have resonated through
                         the ‘body cultures’ of different societies and epochs (Eichberg 1998). One rela-
                         tively recent expression of such shifts in the culture of bodies is that we are not
                         as limited as before to the body handed out at birth. Through appropriately
                         scientific techniques and technologies, and less constrained by prescribed
                         models of the body, it is believed possible to engage in ‘building a better body’
                         (Stratton 1999). Bodybuilding demands more than desultory exercise in pursuit
                         of lower body weight and admiring comments from others about being  ‘in
                         shape’. It requires working on each component of the body before a real
                         or imaginary mirror (or lens) to produce the desired visible effect. The result
                         may appear excessive and even repugnant to those outside the culture of the
                         gymnasium. Muscularity in men is historically desirable in most body cultures
                         as long as they do not become ‘musclebound’, but in women it is rather more
                         culturally problematic. Heightened levels of muscularity among women is
                         frequently represented as freakish and  ‘butch’, and homophobically derided
                         as a sign of lesbianism (Wright and Clarke 1999; Miller 2001). In the face of
                         such media-exacerbated hostility, there are often attempts to recuperate the
                         imaged muscular female body for a conventional binary model of masculine
                         men and feminine women. For example, Angela Ndalianis has written of the
                         representational tensions within bodybuilding ‘muscle’ magazines like Flex:

                           But, as the old saying goes,  ‘a picture tells a thousand words’, and in
                           bodybuilding magazines it tells a story that attempts to bring back into
                           play a gendered power structure. While, in one way, the written word
                           serves to break down years of a subculture that was dominated by rigid
                           boundaries that served to contain and construct gender according to a
                           system of power negotiated around sexual difference, the image often con-
                           tradicts the word, aiming covertly to re-establish the status quo and set up
                           clear gender demarcations.
                                                                        (Ndalianis 1995: 19)
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188