Page 147 - Standards for K-12 Engineering Education
P. 147

Standards for K-12 Engineering Education?

               132                                            STANDARDS FOR K–12 ENGINEERING EDUCATION?




               Engineering standards based on a big ideas like these could be more concise and focused than past
               standards and could emphasize connections and distinctions among fields of science, technology,
               engineering, and mathematics.


               Conclusion

               The preliminary ideas offered here do not even begin to address the deeper issues of implementation.  In
               Massachusetts, which enacted the strongest set of technology and engineering standards in the nation in
               2001, considerable progress has been made in many school districts to implement the standards.
               However, change at the classroom level has required significant time and funding from a number of
               governmental and private organizations in the state.

               Although educational systems have a great deal of inertia, they can be moved.  Recent discussions about
               accountability in the forthcoming reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act have
               suggested the need for “. . . incorporating indicators of the many fields of knowledge and skills that young
               people need to be successful.”  (A Broader, Bolder Approach, available on-line at
               http://www.boldapproach.org/report_20090625.html)  If enacted into law, this philosophy may help
               motivate change as well.

               We are optimistic that, if a clear, concise vision for engineering education can be developed and
               integrated into the fabric of state standards in the core subjects of science and mathematics, then
               implementation of engineering education will begin to take hold.


               References

               AAAS (1990). Science for All Americans: A Project 2061 Report. American Association for the
               Advancement of Science, Project 2061. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

               AAAS (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. American Association for the Advancement of Science,
                   Project 2061. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

               Beatty, Alexandra, Rapporteur (2008). Common Standards for K–12 Education?: Considering the
                       Evidence: Summary of a Workshop Series, Committee on State Standards in Education: A
                       Workshop Series, National Research Council.  Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

               Duschl, R.A., Schweingruber, H.A., and Shouse, A.W., eds. (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning
                       and Teaching Science in Grades K–8. National Research Council. Washington, DC: National
                       Academies Press.
               Foecke, H. A. (1970). “Engineering in the Humanistic Tradition,” Impact of Science on Society, vol. XX,
                       no. 2.

               Foecke, Harold A. (1995). “Fifty Years of UNESCO Leadership in Science and Technology Education,”
                       UNESCO 50 Years for Education, CD-ROM.

               Hudson, S., McMahon, K., and Overstreet, C. (2002). The 2000 National Survey of Science and
                       Mathematics Education: Compendium of Tables.  Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.











                                        Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152