Page 155 - Strategies and Applications in Quantum Chemistry From Molecular Astrophysics to Molecular Engineer
P. 155

140                                                   M. DEFRANCESCHI ET AL






                              where E is the total energy and V(r) represents the electron-nucleus attraction potential and
                              the electron-electron repulsion potential.

                              Except for a few  situations  related to scattering problems  where observables typically
                              involve momenta, physical quantities are defined in position space (r-representation) even
                              where the momentum space representation (p-representation) would be more natural. For
                              instance,  experiments such as  Compton  profiles and  (e,2e) measurements  [3,4] are
                              compared  with  theoretical  momentum  space  distribution  obtained by Fourier
                              transformation of wavefunctions  [5] computed in the position space. The lack of wave
                              functions directly evaluated in momentum space is no doubt due to the development of
                              techniques using the Schrödinger equation  in  the r-representation for a large variety of
                              situations. At least two other factors contribute to dissuade the physicists and chemists
                              from considering momentum space as an interesting direction for solving their problems.
                              First,  interpretation and  visualization can be  more difficult in  momentum  space and,
                              second, the Schrödinger equation, and approximations to it, e.g. the Hartree-Fock (HF)
                              equation, are expressed as integral equations in the p-representation instead of differential
                              equations in  the r-representation. In  spite of these  barriers,  momentum  space  offers
                              advantages  which  should not be  ignored. For  instance,  it provides an  interesting
                              alternative way for solving electronic structure  problems of  atoms and  molecules,
                              traditionally addressed in position space [6,7].  This aspect is central to this work.

                              As far as in the thirties the possibility of calculating wave functions in momentum space
                              has been recognized ; in  1932, Hylleraas [8] treated the problem of a one-electron atom,
                              the solutions of which for discrete and continuous  spectra are well  known  [9]. In  1949,
                              McWeeny and Coulson [10,11] tried to generalize this approach to many-electron systems
                              involving electron repulsion terms.  Starting with fixed trial  functions, they applied the
                              iterative method developed by Svartholm  [12] for the case of nuclear systems to solve
                              variationally the integral momentum space wave equation of helium atom and hydrogen
                              molecule   and  H 2 . Owing to convergence difficulties found in  the  simplest systems,

                              they concluded that direct calculations of electronic wave functions in momentum space
                              were hopeless  ; and so the  subject disappeared from Quantum Chemistry  literature for
                              nearly 30 years. The situation changed in  1981, when two crystallographers, Navaza and
   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160