Page 17 - Strategies and Applications in Quantum Chemistry From Molecular Astrophysics to Molecular Engineer
P. 17

2
                                                                                              J. TOMASI
                           the meaning of theoretical chemistry which now may be defined as the discipline studying
                           molecules with quantum mechanical methods.
                           The progress in science does not proceed with a steady pace. Periods of quantitative
                           growths, often rich of results, begin, and end, with sudden changes which gives rise to a
                           quantitative turn in the research methods.
                           In my opinion, the  last qualitative  change in theoretical  chemistry  corresponds to the
                           introduction of computers in chemistry. A conventional date for the beginning of this last
                           period may be indicated in the Boulder Conference of 1959 [2], i.e. more than thirty years
                           ago. The use of more and more large and efficient computers has shifted the attention of
                           theoretical chemists to an extensive use of quantum mechanical calculations.

                           Quantum  mechanics was the  dominant theory in chemistry  even before the  advent of
                           electronic computers. The conventional date for the beginning of this period may be fixed
                           at 1927 with the publications of the Heitler and London paper on hydrogen molecule [3].
                           The growth of theoretical  chemistry (or better, theoretical quantum chemistry) between
                            1930 and  1960  (thirty  years, again, as  for  the  last period)  has  followed a research
                           programme different from that accepted in the most recent period.

                           We shall return  later on  this  difference of approach. Before  the advent  of quantum
                           mechanics theoretical chemistry was influenced by the lack of a comprehensive theory for
                           matter at the microscopic level. In the preceding thirty years, i.e. from the beginning of this
                           century, there has been an evolution of the main line of research, based on the adoption of
                           approaches  (paradigms) derived from physics with a progressive  shift from an alternative
                           approach,  based on chemical concepts, elaborated during the  last part of the preceding
                           century by structural chemists. The physical approach has given much emphasis to the
                           molecule, considered as a physical entity, the properties of which are sufficient to interpret,
                           and to predict, the chemical behaviour of matter.
                           According to  this  partisan  view of the  evolution of theoretical  chemistry  we draw the
                           impression of  a  choice, in  which the  single molecules  represent the  basic  unit of
                           investigation, the quantum theory provide the theoretical basis, and computer calculations
                           the final step. The three periods of growth are, in reality related, and the "sudden" changes
                           in between do not corresponds to "revolutions" in according to the meaning this word has
                           in the  Kuhn's analysis [4].
                           Just at the closing speech of the event we have chosen as indicative of the beginning of the
                           last  period, the Boulder Conference  of  1959,  C.A.  Coulson [5] expressed the
                           preoccupation that the new era of theoretical chemistry, so bright of exciting  promises,
                           would  also lead to a  splitting of the  discipline  into two  (or to be  more precise, three)
                           separate domains, each having its own set of paradigms, and not paying much attention to
                           the evolution of the other domains.
                           According to the Coulson words, the exponents of group I were committed to "in-depth
                           computing" and "prepared to abandon all the chemical concepts and simple pictorial quality
                           in their results" "in order to achieve complete accuracy"; while "the exponent of group II
                           argue that  chemistry  is an  experimental  subject, whose  results are  built  into  a pattern
                           around quite elementary concepts". The third group was at that  moment (1959) more a
                           hope than a reality; the "spreading of quantum chemistry to biology": "Group I exponents
                           will throw up their hands in horror at such attempts", "group II members will mistrust the
                           complete  neglect of many  terms  which are  known to  be  large", but "the prizes  are
                           immense":  "there is much experience possessed by professional biologists which could be
                           linked with the deeper levels of interpretation associated with quantum chemistry", even if
                           "biological systems are much more perverse than any laboratory chemical system".
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22