Page 17 - Successful Onboarding
P. 17

6 • Successful Onboarding


        forward if you have a revolving door atmosphere, with key people leaving
        after short tenures and new people entering, bringing with them different
        skills, agendas, and commitments?
           Even if Charles had stayed, his hiring firm’s onboarding program would
        have failed to satisfy the organization’s needs. By limiting to a short pro-
        gram that merely familiarized new hires with the culture and helped them
        with some basic administrative tasks, Charles’ firm failed to acclimate new
        employees to their organization and its broader business goals. As a result,
        Charles would have been unable to connect his efforts with the firm’s strat-
        egy as creatively and proactively as he otherwise might. And if there were
        elements of the onboarding experience that caused Charles to get excited
        about a future at the company, there is a chance that Charles would have
        forgiven the company over his their initial entry snafus. Finally, by failing
        to explore with Charles over a sustained period how the organization
        defines success and how this could relate to the specifics of his own career,
        Charles’ firm was failing—by a long shot—to maximize its return on
        human capital.


        Strategic Onboarding: A Burning Need

        The sub-par performance of non-strategic onboarding programs seems
        especially troubling for firms when we consider the broader business con-
        text. Managers have long understood the financial and strategic challenges
        of integrating new talent. For decades, firms have wrestled with how to
        reduce time-to-productivity for new hires and increase retention. Yet today,
        it is not uncommon for organizations to battle 10 to 15% annual attrition,
        and they face the daunting prospect (or opportunity, depending on your
        perspective) of replacing over 50% of their employee base in a three- to
        five-year period. This phenomenon has received much attention in the
        business press. In 2008, in the midst of a weak economy and rising unem-
        ployment, BusinessWeek ran an article entitled “The Global Talent
        Crisis,” which cited “attracting and retaining talent” as one of the top
        threats to business success perceived by the over 850 C-level executives
                 2
        surveyed. “Competition” was the only threat that ranked higher.
           The broad trend facing hiring managers today is a dramatic increase in
        demand for high-potential recruits. Most large companies have highly
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22