Page 192 - Successful Onboarding
P. 192

176 • Successful Onboarding


        employer explained the tactics and underlying strategy to you. And if you
        were a young hire without industry experience, you would not understand
        what you were doing at all (like Mark initially at Häagen-Dazs).
           Organizations need to give new hires sufficient context for under-
        standing the win plan by offering insight into the operating conditions that
        inform this strategy and its execution. Sharing information about com-
        petitors, company resources, and decisions associated with allocating those
        resources is especially important. Many new hires who have not worked
        in an industry before do not know much about the other players serving a
        market, including the extent of the competition, how individual com-
        petitors behave, and the strengths and weaknesses of each.
           One useful approach might be for an onboarding program to break the
        competition down according to a widely used and fundamental framework
        in the strategy world—management consultant Michael Porter’s Five
        Forces framework for industry analysis. New hires could learn about the
        threat of substitute offerings competing with the firm’s own; the threat of
        new players entering the firm’s market; how intense the rivalry among
        competitors is in the industry; information about customer buying power;
        and information about the bargaining power of suppliers. Since all of these
        affect the formulation and success of an organization’s win plan, commu-
        nicating them to new hires goes a long way toward rendering the firm’s
        win plan comprehensible in their eyes. Front-line employees especially
        need this orientation, as they are typically operating along a single thread
        of the overall strategy and have very little opportunity to otherwise gain a
        greater perspective.
           Let’s consider an example of how a company might communicate
        competitive information. For years, Home Depot had enjoyed a largely
        uncompetitive landscape, exploiting its scale advantages over smaller local
        retailers and providing its customers with discount prices and a broad
        selection of common products. Front-line employees were well condi-
        tioned to Home Depot’s retail platform and long-term strategy (whether
        or not if it was ever explicitly taught to them).
           Home Depot added a new element to its strategy about 5 years ago
        when, in response to competition from Lowe’s, it decided to differentiate
        itself by offering customers unique products they could not find anywhere
        else. Home Depot created an in-house product development function and
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197