Page 44 - Successful Onboarding
P. 44

The Business Case for Onboarding • 33


        can achieve. Is it possible to take an average mentoring program and turn it
        from a 1 into a 50? Probably not. But even a 20% increase in quality (in other
        words, a multiplier of 1.2), can substantially affect an individual worker’s out-
        put because of the multiplying effect of the Onboarding Multiplier.
           The Onboarding Multiplier does not always impact positively on an
        individual’s NHC variables or the overall employee output ranking itself.
        Poorly designed onboarding programs (or well-designed programs exe-
        cuted poorly) can detract from an individual’s capability, drive, connect-
        edness, or context and in turn decrease the individual’s overall New Hire
        Contribution. Imagine that a new hire is immediately placed on a long-
        term and unique project with few other colleagues and no initiatives or
        programs in place to engage the individual. It would be very difficult for
        this new hire to develop a connection to, and engagement with, the firm
        he or she has just joined. This would undoubtedly result in a decrease in
        connectedness and possibly in drive, leading to an overall reduction in
        output. If you value the productivity of your new hires, it’s that much more
        critical to examine your onboarding practices through a strategic and
        strategic lens to avoid negative results.


        Remaking the New Hire Employer–Employee
        Compact

        So far we have made a business case for strategic onboarding by focusing on
        the direct benefits an onboarding program provides to the enterprise. Yet
        onboarding offers employees concrete benefits as well. When we look at it
        from an employee’s perspective, we realize that a solid program holds the
        potential to fundamentally remake the compact between employees and
        their organizations. This compact, the mutual agreement between employer
        and employee, has already changed in recent years—and not necessarily for
        the better. Employees are now asked to work harder, smarter, longer hours
        and give up cherished long-term benefits. The promise of “lifetime employ-
        ment” has also been shattered. Employees today are far less loyal. As one
        study has shown, younger workers will change jobs an average of ten times
        before they turn forty. Onboarding allows you to remake the compact
                            6
        between employer and employee in a way that makes employees more ful-
        filled and that allows firms to realize increased engagement, retention, and
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49