Page 469 - Sustainable Cities and Communities Design Handbook
        P. 469
     Japanese Smart Communities as Industrial Policy Chapter j 21 439
             NSS a legitimacy that transcended its predecessor documents. On top of that
             legitimacy was legal authority: at least 20 other national laws are obligated to
             refer to the NSS (OECD, 2016, pp. 79e80). In turn, the NSS is obliged to
             reference the NRP.
                Compared with its 2008 iteration (not to mention earlier national plans),
             the 2015 NSS devoted much attention to how Japan’s energy, demographic,
             climate, and other challenges can be alleviated through smart communities,
             renewable energy, resilience, and related initiatives. In spatial terms, the 2015
             NSS stressed the need to build (in ascending order of size) “small stations”
             (chiisana kyoten) in rural areas, “sustainable residential areas” (teijuu jiritsu
             ken) within cities, and “collaborative core urban areas” (renkei chusuu toshi
             ken) across cities. All of these spatial forms underscore the multiple benefits of
             concentrating public services (such as medical, welfare, and elderly care fa-
             cilities) in compact nodes and clusters. Such densification encourages greater
             energy efficiency and disaster resilience.
                The 2015 NSS paid careful attention to smart and distributed energy
             because its design team included Kashiwagi as its first-ever energy expert and
             he made a point of emphasizing smart communities and smart energy systems
             (Kashiwagi, 2015). Considering Japan’s vulnerability when it comes to energy,
             it is rather surprising that its previous spatial planning initiatives did not
             include an energy expert. However, in fact, few countries integrate these policy
             domains, which is why the European Commission set up the Spatial Planning
             and Energy for Communities In All Landscapes project from March 2013 to
             March 2016 (SPECIAL, 2013).
             POLICY INTEGRATION IN THE COMPACT CITY
             Policy integration on building compact cities is an additional development
             that is amplifying collaboration and the effective use of scarce fiscal, human,
             and other resources. Fig. 21.6 outlines the compact city and role of the
             “Locational Optimization Plan.” As in virtually all Japanese smart commu-
             nity projects, policy integration between energy and spatial planning has
             encouraged robust policies to foster densification, to help cope with depop-
             ulation and aging in the context of accelerating climate change and other
             hazards.
                The administrative agency to achieve this integration is also in place, via
             the Compact-City Design Assistance Team (CCDAT). The CCDAT was
             developed in March 2015 under the auspices of the Comprehensive Strategy
             for Regional Development, which itself was given Cabinet assent on
             December 27, 2014. The CCDAT is centered on the Ministry of Land, Infra-
             structure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), but it also includes representation
             from 10 other agencies, including METI and MOE. This broad representation
             is deliberate because designing the compact city requires addressing energy,
             disaster resilience, interregional cooperation, urban farming, education, health





