Page 23 -

8 ERICKSON AND SIAU
an approach based on the formal specification language OASIS that sets the foundation for de-
livering on the promises of MDA. The chapter also presents a strategy to define and eventually
automate the transformation of conceptual models into software systems. In addition, this chapter
introduces OLIVANOVA Model Execution as an implementation of the OO-Method.

CONCLUSIONS AND POST HOC ANALYSIS

Reviewing and selecting chapters to include in the volume were difficult tasks for the three volume
editors. The job entailed much more perspiration than inspiration. There is much more frustration
than fun in the process. Nevertheless, now that the volume is ready, the editors emphasize that
editing the volume was a challenging, but at the same time, rewarding experience. The chapters
represent state-of-the-art research in the field and serve to inform readers of potential and future
areas of research. Further, many of the contributing authors are internationally well-known re-
searchers in the area.

REFERENCES

Armstrong, D., and Hardgrave, B. 2007. Understanding mindshift learning: the transition to object-oriented
development. MIS Quarterly, 31, 3, 453–474.
Avison, D., and Fitzgerald, G. 2003. Where now for development methodologies? Communications of the
ACM, 46, 1, 78–82.
———. 2006. Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, 4th ed. Maidenhead,
UK: McGraw-Hill.
Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heine-
man.
Erickson, J., and Siau, K. 2008. Web services, service oriented computing, and service oriented architecture:
separating hype from reality. Journal of Database Management, 19, 3, 42–54.
Erickson, J.; Lyytinen, K.; and Siau, K. 2005. Agile modeling, agile software development, and extreme
programming: the state of research. Journal of Database Management, 16, 4, 88–100.
Hardgrave, B.; Davis, F.; and Riemenschneider, C. 2003. Investigating determinants of software developers’
intentions to follow methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 1, 123–151.
Hirschheim, R., and Klein, H. 1989. Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications
of the ACM, 32, 10, 1199–1216.
Hirschheim, R.A.; Klein, H.K.; and Lyytinen, K. 1995. Information Systems Development and Data Model-
ing: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iivari, J.; Hirschheim, R.; and Klein, H.A. 2001. Dynamic framework for classifying information systems
development methodologies and approaches. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 3,
179–218.
Rubinstein, D. 2007. Standish Group Report: There’s less development chaos today. SD Times, March 1.
Available at www.sdtimes.com/content/article.aspx?ArticleID=30247 (accessed on March 8, 2008).
Schmidt, R.; Lyytinen, K.; Keil, M.; and Cule, P. 2001. Identifying software project risks: an International
Delphi study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 4, 5–36.
Siau, K., and Tan, X. 2005a. Improving the quality of conceptual modeling using cognitive mapping tech-
niques. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 55, 3, 343–365.
———. 2005b. Technical communication in information systems development: the use of cognitive map-
ping. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications, 48, 3, 269–284.
Siau, K.; Wand, Y.; and Benbasat, I. 1997. The relative importance of structural constraints and surface
semantics in information modeling. Information Systems, 22, 2/3, 155–170.
Smith, H.J.; Keil, M.; and Depledge, G. 2001. Keeping mum as the project goes under: toward an explana-
tory model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 2, 189–227.
Wei, C.; Chiang, R.; and Wu, C. 2006. Accommodating individual preferences in the categorization of
documents: a personalized clustering approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 2,
173–201.