Page 74 -
P. 74

IDENTIFYING  THE  DRIVERS  OF  ISD  METHOD  EMERGENCE     59
                    information systems (IS) developers rarely adopt methods in their entirety; instead they adapt and
                    apply method elements in a pragmatic way (see, e.g., Bansler and Bødker, 1993; Fitzgerald, 1997,
                    1998; Fitzgerald, Russo, and Stolterman, 2002; Madsen and Kautz, 2002; Stolterman, 1991, 1992,
                    1994). Others argue that the formalized method is just one element among many that influence
                    and shape the actual unfolding development process and situated use of methods—which has been
                    referred to as the unique method (Truex, Baskerville, and Travis, 2000), the local methodology
                    (Vidgen, 2002; Vidgen et al., 2002), or the method-in-action (Fitzgerald, Russo, and Stolterman,
                    2002). However, so far, little theoretical and empirical research has addressed the practical and
                    temporal details of how and why the unique and local method emerges. To help overcome this
                    deficiency, we have previously investigated and meticulously mapped the relationship between
                    what influences and shapes the method and how it consequently emerges in a Multimedia project
                    (Kautz, 2004) and a Web project (Madsen, Kautz, and Vidgen, 2006). In this chapter, we draw
                    on and develop the research further and more conceptually by exploring how unique and locally
                    situated ISD methods unfold over time and why they emerge differently. The purpose is to identify
                    the underlying sequence and drivers of change in ISD method emergence.
                      As our object of study we focus on the emergent method, which we define as the unfolding
                    development process and the activities and the applied method elements that comprise this process.
                    This definition addresses the development process as a sequence of activities (Sambamurthy and
                    Kirsch, 2000). The choice of the concepts of emergent method, when we describe and analyze
                    concrete cases, and method emergence, when we relate to the phenomenon on a general level, is
                    inspired by Pettigrew (1987). Studying change processes in firms, he argues that from a holistic
                    and systemic perspective the language of process is characterized by verb forms such as emerg-
                    ing, elaborating, mobilizing, changing, dissolving, and transforming, whereas at the level of the
                    individual actor the emphasis is on enacting, acting, reacting, interacting, and adapting (Pettigrew,
                    1987). While we take the individual actor into account, we are primarily interested in the unfold-
                    ing of the development process as an outcome of a complex interplay of enacting and interacting
                    actors and structures.
                      In the next sections, we describe our research approach and develop a theoretical framework
                    for understanding method emergence in practice. Then we describe the emergent methods in two
                    longitudinal case studies of a Multimedia project and a Web project. The chapter systematically
                    compares the elements and interactions that contributed to the method emergence in the two cases
                    with the aim of explaining why they unfolded differently. The results of the cross-case comparison
                    are discussed in relation to process theory to identify the underlying process forms and drivers.
                    The chapter ends with a summary of the main conclusions.

                    RESEARCH APPROACH

                    For the research presented in this chapter we draw on two empirical case studies of ISD projects
                    in practice. The purpose of the first project was to develop a multimedia information system
                    (MMIS) to spread knowledge about software process improvement (SPI) and quality manage-
                    ment to information technology (IT) professionals. The project was undertaken for the European
                    Union (EU) based on a joint bid by two software organizations: an IT consultancy and an academic
                    organization. The Multimedia project lasted twenty-two months. The second project concerned
                    the development of a Web-based information system and was performed in-house in a small to
                    medium-sized market research company. The Web project was conducted in contracted collabora-
                    tion with academic researchers but for the benefit of the market research department. The purpose
                    was to improve the department’s internal work practices and support its online sales to customers
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79