Page 149 - The Art and Science of Analog Circuit Design
P. 149

Carl Battjes


        Distributed Deflector for a Cathode Ray Tube


        In 1961, Cliff Moulton's IGHz 519 'scope led the bandwidth race. This
        instrument had no vertical amplifier. The input was connected to a
        125-ohm transmission line which directly fed a single-ended distributed
        deflection system. Schematics in Figures 10-8 and 10-9 show somewhat
        pictorially what a distributed deflector looks like. The 519 deflector is not
        shown. Within the CRT envelope was a meander line distributed deflec-
        tion plate. Tuning capacitors were located at the sharp bends of the mean-
        der line. The line was first tuned as a mechanical assembly and later
        incorporated into the CRT envelope.
          Terminated distributed deflector structures create a resistive driving-
        point impedance in place of one lumped capacitance. They also synchro-
        nize the signal travel along the deflection plate to the velocity of the
        electron beam speeding through the deflection plate length. If a distrib-
        uted deflector is not used, deflection sensitivity is lost at high frequency
        due to transit time. Relative sensitivity is

              -
            JL   where f is frequency and f te is an inverse transit time function.
             /«*
          This is usually significant at 100MHz and above, and therefore dis-
        tributed deflectors show up in 'scopes with bandwidths of 100MHz or
        higher. Various ingenious structures have been used to implement distrib-
        uted deflectors. All could be modeled as assemblies of T-coils. The effec-
        tive electron beam deflection response is a function of all of the T-coil tap
        voltages properly delayed and weighted.

        Theoretical and Pragmatic Coil Proportions


                                                        1
        The basis for the earliest T-coil designs was m-derived  filter theory. The
        delay lines and the distributed amplifier seemed to work best when the
                                                                  2
        coils were proportioned—as per the classic Jasberg-Hewlett paper —at
        m = 1.27 (coupling coefficient = 0.234). This corresponds to a coil length
        slightly longer than the diameter. In the design phase, there was an in-
        telligent juggling of coil proportions based on the preshoot-overshoot
        behavior of the amplifier or delay line. The trial addition of bridging
        capacitance invariably led to increased step response aberrations.



          m-derived filters were outcomes of image-parameter filter theory of the past. The parameter "m"
          determined the shape of the amplitude and phase response. "m"=1.27 approximated flat delay
          response. Filters could not be exactly designed, using this theory, because the required termina-
          tion was not realizable.
          This classic paper described both the m-derived T-coil section and, very briefly, the constant-
          resistance T-coil section. The use of these sections in distributed amplifiers was the main issue
          and nothing was mentioned of other uses.

                                                                                       131
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154