Page 47 - The Art of Designing Embedded Systems
P. 47

34  THE ART OF  DESIGNING EMBEDDED SYSTEMS


                       we fail-a  lot. It seems the most common way to compensate is a promise
                       made to ourselves to “try harder” or to “do better.” It’s rarely effective.
                           Change works best when we change the way we do things. Forget the
                       vague promises-invent  a new way of accomplishing your goal. Planning
                       on reducing your drinking? Getting regular exercise? Develop a process
                       that ensures that you’re meeting your goal.
                           The same goes for improving your abilities as a developer. Forget the
                      vague promises to “read more books” or whatever. Invent a solution that
                      has a better chance of succeeding. Even better-steal  a solution that works
                      from someone else.
                           Cynicism abounds in this field. We’re all self-professed experts of
                       development, despite the obvious evidence of too many failed projects.
                           I talk to a lot of companies who are convinced that change is impos-
                       sible; that the methods I espouse are not effective (despite the data that
                       shows the contrary), or that “management” will never let them take the
                       steps needed to effect change.
                           That’s the idea behind the “7 Steps.” Do it covertly, if need be; keep
                       management in the dark if you’re convinced of their unwillingness to use
                       a defined software process to create better embedded projects faster.
                           If management is enlightened enough to understand that the firmware
                       crisis requires change-and  lots of it!-then   educate them as you educate
                       yourself.
                           Perhaps  an  analogy  is  in  order.  The  industrial  revolution  was
                      spawned by a lot of forces, but one of the most important was the concen-
                      tration of capital. The industrialists spent vast sums on foundries, steel
                      mills, and other means of production. Though it was possible to hand-craft
                      cars, dumping  megabucks  into  assembly  lines  and  equipment yielded
                      lower prices, and eventually paid off the investment in spades.
                           The same holds true for intellectual capital. Invest in the systems and
                      processes that will create massive dividends over time. If we’re unwilling
                       to do so, we’ll be left behind while others, more adaptable, put a few bucks
                       up front and win the software wars.

                              A final thought:
                              If you’re a process cynic, if you disbelieve all I’ve said in this
                         chapter, ask yourself one question: do I consistently deliver products
                         on time and on budget?
                              If the answer is no, then what are you doing about it?
                       I                                                              1
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52