Page 41 - Bruce Ellig - The Complete Guide to Executive Compensation (2007)
P. 41
Chapter 1. Executive Compensation Framework 27
group. Stock options from the former company are typically converted on an equivalency
basis, namely, (1) no reduction in ratio of exercise price to market price, (2) the option spread
is not greater, and (3) the vesting and other option terms remain the same. This is described
more fully in Chapter 8 on long-term incentives.
A key difference between a spin-off and the earlier-described initial public offering is
that with an IPO, stock is sold to new shareholders. With a spin-off, stock is given away to
existing shareholders.
The objective of an IPO is typically to raise capital, enabling the organization to invest
in buildings, equipment, and people. However, it might also be to reverse an LBO (leveraged
buyout), taking down debt and liquefying investor holdings. A spin-off is frequently done to
sharpen the focus and direction of an organization, capitalizing on its core competencies,
and, hopefully, increasing shareholder value.
Market Cycle and Compensation Elements
A comparison of the different stages of the market cycle goes a long way to explain stock price
movement. When companies are in the development and growth stage, higher multiples are
given to their earnings in anticipation of higher future profits, thereby resulting in rising
stock prices. Companies in the mature phase can expect a sluggish market for their stock,
and those in decline are likely to see their stock price head in the same direction. However,
projections of the future based on past company performance are subject to significant error
because the rate of growth is likely to be greater or less than in the past. This degree of
miscalculation is compounded by the number of years used in the projection.
As emphasized earlier, a particular company may have units in different phases of the
market cycle. Thus, while it may be possible to generalize as to a company’s stage in the
market cycle, there are different needs for different parts. For this, different divisional pay
programs may need to be developed. Shown in Figure 1-8 are the hypothetical company
Brucell’s eight divisions in relation to market stage and profitability. The size of the circles
reflects relative size one to another. One only has to contrast “1” (high profit in the threshold
stage) with “8” (low profit in a decline phase) to see that one pay plan will not fit both situations.
Market Stage
Threshold Growth Maturity Decline
High
A B
5
1
Profitability 6 7
3
2 4 8
C
Low D
Figure 1-8. Market stage vs. profitability