Page 570 - Bruce Ellig - The Complete Guide to Executive Compensation (2007)
P. 570

556               The Complete Guide to Executive Compensation


                                                      Incentives
            Performance
            Attainment           Salary         Annual        Long Term         Total

            At maximum         $1,000,000      $2,000,000     $4,000,000      $7,000,000
                                      14%            29%             57%
            At 3rd quartile    $1,000,000      $1,500,000     $2,000,000      $4,500,000
                                      22%            33%             44%
            At target          $1,000,000      $1,000,000     $1,000,000      $3,000,000
                                      33%            33%             33%
            At 1st quartile    $1,000,000       $500,000        $500,000      $2,000,000
                                      50%            25%             25%
            Below threshold    $1,000,000             0               0       $1,000,000
                                     100%
            Table 9-19. Salary/incentive pay relationships

                relation to such values as earnings per share or economic profit, one can determine if
                the value created is in excess of the plan costs and, if so, by how much.
             51. How does one determine the number of years appropriate for a long-term incen-
                tive plan? Long-term incentive plans should have a term consistent with a company’s
                business planning period and market cycle. A new plan should be put in place each year.
                include Reasons: (a) it dollar averages results from one plan to another, (b) it increases
                retention because there are always unvested plans in effect, (c) it makes it easier to
                increase or decrease the importance of this pay element given an action each year, and
                (d) lacking an announced change, executives know what to expect in future years.
             52. Should an attempt be made to patent the new incentive plan? Perhaps, if it is
                sufficiently unique. But if it is, is it not likely to have limited appeal elsewhere, having
                been customized to one’s own needs? Nevertheless, if it is believed the plan provides a
                competitive advantage and could be copied by others in the industry, it might be an
                appropriate consideration. But it may be more difficult to achieve than trademarking a
                descriptive term or acronym.
             53. If an interim CEO is appointed following the departure of the previous CEO
                and prior to the arrival of a replacement, how is the interim CEO to be compen-
                sated? The answer is a function of length of assignment and difficulty of work. Brief
                tenure with a maintenance responsibility might be simply the prorated salary of the
                departed CEO. Longer tenures and more challenging assignments, such as corporate
                restructuring, should include cash incentive awards for success along with equity
                awards, possibly a combination of stock options and stock awards.
            Why Do We Want to Make These Changes?

              1. How much of the reason for adopting an incentive plan is to be in vogue and
                how much is to truly pay in relation to performance? One approach will require
                significant effort to design a meaningful plan; the other is much easier, since the plan is
                more pro forma.
   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575