Page 591 - Bruce Ellig - The Complete Guide to Executive Compensation (2007)
P. 591

Chapter 10. The Board of Directors                 577


           submit proposals outside of this SEC rule but would have to incur the cost of preparing a
           proxy statement and soliciting votes.
               The shareholders vote on such matters as election of the directors, approval of inde-
           pendent auditors, authorization of the number of shares of stock the company may issue, and
           other management issues or shareholder resolutions.
               With the increasing financial resources of pension plans, institutional shareholders have
           been gaining an increasing portion of the stock market. Institutional shareholders with large
           blocks of stock have become a powerful voice in determining what companies should and
           should not do. They are also very influential in determining who will serve as directors. Once
           content to simply disagree by selling their stock, many shareholders today push the issue of
           corporate governance to the forefront of the board agenda and the shareholder meeting. As
           of 2004, mutual funds have had to indicate how they voted on proxy proposals.

           Corporate Governance

           At the turn of the century, corporate governance evolved with the passage from privately held
           companies to publicly held companies. The shift grew out of the need for private companies
           to “go public” in order to raise needed capital through the issuance of company stock. Funds
           from the sale of stock were a debt-free solution to capital needs.
               A number of organizations have identified what they believe to be appropriate corporate
           governance principles. Among the most notable of these organizations are the Business
           Roundtable, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), Institutional
           Shareholder Services, the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), and
           Teachers Insurance Annuity Association-College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF).
           Several have adopted formulas to measure the effectiveness of the company’s corporate
           governance.
               Former SEC Chairman Richard Breeden investigated corporate practices at WorldCom
           and issued a report unanimously approved by the company’s new board. Although the report
           deals with a company coming out of bankruptcy, several recommendations are worth con-
           sideration by other companies as well: separation of the board chair and the CEO positions;
           a ten-year term limit for directors; shareholder approval required for any pay package
           and severance payment above specified levels (e.g., $15 million for pay and $10 million
           for severance); compensation consultants retained by the compensation committee (not
           by management); and every member of the compensation committee independent and
           experienced in pay issues.
               Nothing has had a greater impact than the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which was
           passed following a number of business scandals involving fraud. The act included the follow-
           ing requirements:

             1. Adoption of or changes to a corporate code of ethics must be disclosed in a timely
                manner.
             2. CEOs and CFOs must certify in writing their quarterly and annual financial
                statements.
             3. Material changes in the condition of the company’s financial condition must be
                disclosed in real time.
             4. Publicly traded companies must have only independent directors on their audit
                committee.
   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596