Page 236 - Harnessing the Management Secrets of Disney in Your Company
P. 236

Re-Creating the Magic                  217



             Disney                                              4,000%
             Performance 1984–2006                         3/16/06
                                                                 3,500%

                                                                 3,000%
                                                                 2,500%
                                 Disney
                                                                 2,000%
                                                                 1,500%
                                                                 1,000%

                                             S&P 500               500%
                                                                     0%

         84   86   88   90   92   94   96   98   00   02   04
        Figure 12-2. The Eisner years financial performance.





        publishing to retailing—and, to the delight of the Big Apple, Broadway
        shows. Here are the results of the Eisner years:


            ■  Revenues from $2.5 billion to $30.8 billion—up 2,000 percent
            ■  Income from $294 million to $4.49 billion—up 1,600 percent
            ■  Cash flow from $100 million to $2.9 billion—up 2,900 percent
            ■  Market value from $1.9 billion to $57.4 billion—up 3,000 percent
            ■  Stock price from $1.33 to $28.40—up 2,100 percent

            When compared with the other five media giants that now control the
        entertainment industry, Disney’s success attributed to Michael Eisner is even
        more heroic. Between 1984 and 2005, the combined reported losses of
        the five competitor companies exceeded $171 billion: Time Warner—$99.7
        billion; Vivendi-Universal—$40.6 billion; Viacom—$21.2 billion; News
        Corporation—$7.2 billion; and Sony—$2.7 billion. Disney did not have a
        single losing year during this time period. Most CEOs would give their eye
        teeth for these results during more than a 21-year reign.
            So, why wasn’t Michael hailed as a hero like Jack Welch in his retirement,
        instead of being relegated to the pile of discards as was Richard Nixon? Was it
   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241