Page 6 - The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs
P. 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS



       Permission  to  adapt  and  redraw  the  following  material  is   Figure  9.4:  Ellis,  D.,  Flaum,  ©.,  Rowlet,  C.,  Marienbach,  E.  and  Seeman,  8.  The
       gratefully  acknowledged.                         Litho-Density  Tool  Calibration,  Paper  SPE  12048.  SPE Aon.  Tech.  Conf.  and
                                                         Exhibition,  1983.  Figure  10.3  pp.  208,  by  permission  of  Elsevier  Science
         Figure  2,1):  from  Theys,  Ph.,  Log  data  acquisition  and  quality  control,  io   Publishing  Co.  Inc.
       Editions  Technip.  pp.  330,  Figure  4.15,  by  permission  of  Editions  Technip.   Figure  9.11:  from  Jackson,  M.P.A.,  and  Talbot,  CJ.  (1986),  pp.  305-323.  Bull.
         Figure  2.14:  from  Dewar,  (1983)  in  Essentials  of  Modera  Open  Hole  Log   Geol.  Soc.  of  America  by  permission  of  the  Geological  Society  of America.
       (nterpretation,  Figure  3.14,  by  permission  of  Penn  Well  Books.   Figure  9.29:  from  Log  Loterpretation  Principles/Applications,  (1989).  Figure  6.4,
         Figure  3.10:  from  Hill  A.D.  (1990)  Production  logging  -  theoretical  and  inter-   by  permission  of  Schlumberger.
       pretative  elements.  Monograph  (14),  Figure  4.10,  from  McKinley,  R.M.  Production   Figure  9.30:  from  Humpbreys  B.  and  Lott,  G.K.  An  investigation  into  nuclear
       Logging,  paper  SPE  10035  presented  al  the  1982  SPE  [otl.  Petroleum  Exhibition   log  responses  of  North  Sea  Jurassic  sandstones  using  mineralogical  analysis.
       and  Technical  Symposium,  Beijing.  March  18-26,  by  permission  of  Society  of   Geological  Applications  of  Wireline  Logs,  eds.  Hurst,  A.,  Lovell,  M.A.  and  Morton,
       Petroleurn  Engineers.                            A.C.,  1990  by  permission  of  the  Geological  Society.
         Figure  3.1L:  from  Hill,  A.D.  (1990)  Production  logging  -  theoretical  and  inter-   Figure  10.3:  from  Ellis.  D.V.  (1987)  Well  Logging  for  Earth  Scientisis,  Figure
       pretative  elements.  Monograph  (14),  Figure  4.33,  from  Dobkins,  T.A.  Improved   ILL.  pp.  238.  oy  permission  of  Elsevier  Science  Publishing  Co.  Inc.
       Methods  to  Determine  Hydraulic  Practurc  Height,  JPT  (April,  1981)  pp.  719-26,  by   Figure  12.1:  from  Cameron,  G.I.F,,  Collinson,  J.D.,  Rider,  M.H.,  and  Li  Xu,
       permission  of  Society  of  Petroleum  Engineers.   Analogue  dipmeter  logs  through  a  prograding  deltatic  sandbody  from  Advances  in
         Figure  4.11:  from  Yassir  and  Dusseault.,  Stress  trajectory  determinations  in  S.W.   Reservoir  Geology,  ed.,  Ashton,  M.  Figure  A2,  pp.  215,  by  permission  of  the
       Ontario  from  borehole  logs,  Figure  2,  Geological  Applications  of  Wireline  Logs  J].   Geological  Society.
       Sp.  Pub.  ne.  65,  pp  169-177  by  permission of the  Geological  Society.   Figure  12.9:  from  Cameron,  G.1.F,  Collinson,  J.D.,  Rider,  M.H.,  and  Li  Xu,
         Figure  6.5:  from  Jackson,  P.P.,  Taylor-Smith,  D.  and  Stanford,  P.N.,  1978,  in   Analogue  dipmeter  logs  through  a  prograding  deltaic  sandbody from Advances  in
       Geophysics  43(6),  pp.  1250-1268,  Figure  8,  by  permission  of  the  Society  of   Reservoir  Geology,  ed.,  Ashton,  M.  Figure  A2.  pp.  215,  by  permission of the
       Exploration  Geophysicists.                       Geological  Society.
         Figure  6.19:  from  Ellis,  D.V,  (1987)  Well  Lagging  for  Earth  Scientists,  pp,  532,   Figure  12.21:  from  Cameron,  G.I,  Collinson,  J.D.  Rider,  M.H.,  and  Li  Xu.
       Figure  6.5,  by  permission  of  Elsevier  Science  Pub.  Co.  Inc.   Analogue  dipmetet  logs  through  a  prograding  deltaic  sandbody  from  Advances  in
         Figure  6.29:  from  Theys,  Ph.,  Log  data  acquisition  and  quality  control,  in   Reservoir  Geology,  ed.,  Ashton,  M.  Special  publication  69,  Figure  4,  pp.  199,
       Editions  Technip,  pp.  330,  Figure  22.18,  by  permission  of   Editions  Technip.   Figure  6,  pp.  201  and  Figure  7,  pp.  202  all  combined,  by  permission of  the
         Figure  6.38:  from  Passey,  Q.R..  Creaney,  §.,  Kula,  J.B.,  Morenti,  FJ.  and   Geological  Society.
       Stroud,  J.D.  (1990)  in  AAPG  74{12)  pp.1777-1794,  Figure  6,  by  permission  of  the   Figure  12.27:  from  Phillips,  S.,  Dipmeter  Interpretation  of Turbidite-Channel
       American  Association  of  Petroleum  Geologists.   Reservoie  Sandstones,  Indian  Draw  Field,  New  Mexico  from  Reservoir
         Figure  6.39:  from  Hillis.  R.R..  Quantification  of  Tertiary  Exhumation  in  the  UK   Sedimentology.  eds.  Tillman,  R.W.  and  Weber,  KJ,  special  publication  40,  Figure
       southern  North  Sea  using  Sonic  Velocity  Data,  in  AAPG  79(1)  pp.  130-152,  Figure   14,  pp.  123  by  permission  of  Society  of  Economic  Paleontologists  and
       1,  by  permission  of  the  American  Association  of  Petroleum  Geologists.   Mineralogists.
         Figure  7.5:  from  Serra,  O.  (1979),  Diagraphies  différées  —  bases  de  l"interpréta-   Figure  12.36:  from  Adams,  J.T.,  Ayodele,  1.K.,  Beedford,  J,  Kaars-Sijpesteijn,
       tion.  Tome  |:  Acquisition  des  données  diagraphiques.  Bull.  Cent.  Rech.   C.H.,  and  Watts,  N.L.  Application  of dipeter  data  in  structural  interpretation,  Niger
       Explor.-Prod.  E?f-  Aquitaine.  Mém.  I,  Figure  138,  by  permission  of  Editions   Delta  from  Geological  Applications  of  Wireline  Logs  Il,  eds.  Hurst  et  aé.,  special
       Technip.                                           publication  65,  Figure  10,  op.  256,  by  permission  of  the  Geological  Soctety.
         Figure  7.15:  from Dresser Alas  (1982),  Well  Logging  and  Interpretation   Figure  13.6:  from  Serta,  O.  Formation  MicroScanner  Image  Interpretation,
       Techniques,  Figure  7.13,  by  permission  of  Dresser  Auas.   Figure  6,  page  6,  by  permission  of  Schlumberger.
         Figure  7,26:  from  Scherer  (1980)  AAPG  Memoir  30,  pp.  436  by  permission  of   Figure  13.13:  from  FMI  Fullbore  Formation  Microlmager,  page  &  (too)  dia-
       the  American  Association  of  Petroleum  Geologists.   gram),  by  permission  of  Schlumberger.
         Figure  7.27:  from  Quirein  et  a?.,  (1982)  in  1982  Annual  Technical  Conference   Figure  13.25:  from  Zemanck,  J.,  Caldwell,  LL,  Glean,  E.E.,  Holcomb,  S.¥.,
       and  Exhibition,  paper  SPE  11143,  Figure  2,  pp.  2,  by  permission  of  Society  of   Norton,  L.J.,  and  Strauss,  AJ.D.  (1969).  The  borehole  televiewer  -  a  new  logging
       Petroleum  Engineers.                             concept  for  fracture  location  and  other  types  of  borehole  inspection.  IPT,  21,  762-
         Figure  8.2:  from  Ellis,  D.¥.  (1987),  Well  Logging for Earth  Scientists,  Figure   774,  Figure  1,  page  255,  by  permission  of  Society  of  Petroleum  Engineers.
       16.12,  pp.  371,  after  Schlumberger.  by  permission  of  Elsevier  Science  Publishing   Figure  13.26:  from  Adas  Wireline  Services  (1992)  in  Digital  Circumferential
       Co,  Inc.                                          Borehole  [maging  Log  (CBIL)  tool  brochure,  by  permission  of Dresser Atlas.
         Figure  8.19:  from  Hillis,  R.R.,  Quantification  of  Tertiary  Exhumation  in  the  UK   Figure  13.29:  from  Tyouiller  et  al.,  Thin-Bed  Reservoir Analysis from  Borehole
       southern  North  Sea  using  Sonic  Velocity  Data,  in  AAPG  79(1)  pp.  130-152,  Figure   Electrical  Images.  SPE  19578,  pp.  61-72,  Figure  9,  by  permission  of  Society  of
       2.  by  permission  of  the  American  Association  of  Petroleum  Geologists.   Petroleum  Engineezs.
         Figure  8.23:  from  Passey,  Q.R.,  Creaney,  S.,  Kula,  J.8.,  Moretti,  FJ.,  and   Figure  14.6;  from  Pky,  RJ.  and  Tyler,  N.  Geological  Characterization  of
       Stroud,  J.D.  A  practical  mode]  for  Organic  Richness  from  Porosity  and  Resistivity   Sandstone  Reeservoirs  from  Reservoir  Characterization,  eds.  Lake.  L.W.  and
       Logs.  AAPG  74(12).  Figure  12,  pp.1789,  by  permission  of  the American   Carrou,  Jr.,  Figure  4,  by  permission  of  the  Bureau  of  Economic  Geology.
       Association  of  Petroleum  Geologists.             Figure  14.7:  from  Van  Wagoner  et  af,  (1990),  Siliclastic  Sequence  Stratigraphy
         Figure  8.30:  from  DSI  Dipole  Shear  Sonic  imager,  Figure  10,  by  permission  of   in  Well  Logs,  Cores,  and  Outcrops:  Concepts  for  High-Resolution  Correlation  of
       Schlumberger,                                      Time  and  Facies,  Figure  8.  by  permission  of  the  American  Association  of
         Figure  8.25:  from  Zemanek,  J.,  Williams,  D.M.,  Schmin.  D.P.,  Shear-Wave   Petroleum  Geologists.
       Logging  using  Multipole  Sources.  Log  Analyst,  32(3),  Figures  |  and  2,  pp.  234,  by   Figure  14.12:  from  Statt  et  af.,  (1992),  Outcrop  gamma-ray  logging  to  improve
       permission  of the American  Association  of  Petroleum  Geologists.   understanding  of  subsurface  well  log  correlations,  from  Geological  Applications  of
         Figure  8.31:  from  Smith,  M.L.,  Sondergeld,  C.H.,  Norris,  J.0.,  The Amoco   Wireline  Logs  0,  ed.  Hurst  et  al.,  special  publication  65,  pp.  3-19,  Figure  8  by
       Array  Sonic  Logger,  Log  Analyst,  32(3),  Figure  1,  pp.  202,  by  permission  of  the   permission  of  the  Geological  Society.
       American  Association  of  Petroleum  Geologists.   Figure  15.8:  from  Loutit  et  al.,  (1988)  Condensed  Sections:  The  Key  w  Age
         Figure  8.32:  from  Hsuk  and  Chang  Shu-Kong,  (987.  Multiple  short  processing   Determination  and  Correlation  of  Continental  Margin  Sequences  from  Sea-Level
       of  array  sonic  waveforms,  in  Geophysics  52(10),  pp.  1376-1390,  Figures  |  and  3,   Changes:  An  Integrated  Approach,  ed.  Wilgus  et  al.,  Figure  20,  by  permission  of
       by  permission  of  the  Society  of  Exploration  Geophysicists.   Society  of  Economic  Paleontologists  and  Mineralogists.
         Figure  8.34:  from  Smith,  M.L.,  Sondergeld,  C.H.,  Norris.  J.0..  The  Amoco   Figure  15,10:  from  Ineson,  J.R..  The Lower  Cretaceous  chalk  play  in  the  Danish
       Array  Sonic  Loggez,  Log  Analyst,  32(3).  Figure  9  pp.  208,  by  permission  of  the   Central  Trough  from  Petroleum  Geology  of  Northwest  Europe:  Proceedings of the
       Afnerican  Association  of  Petroleum  Geologists.   4th  Conference,  |,  ed.,  Parker,  J.2..  Figures  1  and  3,  by  permission  of  the
         Figure  8.36:  by  permission  of  the  Compagnie  Générale  de  Geophysique.   Geological  Society.
         Figure  8.37:  from  Bunch,  A.W.H.  and  Dromgoole,  P.W.  Lithology  and  fluid   Figure  15.13:  from  Vail,  PR.  and  Wormardi,  W.W.,  Well  Log-Seismic  Sequence
       prediction  from  seismic  and  well  data.  [,  1995,  pp.  49-57,  by  permission  of  the   Stratigraphy:  an  Integrated  Tool  for  the  90s  from  Sequence  Stratigraphy  as  an
       Society  of  Exploration  Geophysicists.           Exploration  Tool,  eds.  Armentrout,  J.M.  and  Perkins,  B.F.,  Figures  3,  $,  7,9,  11,
         Figure  9.3:  Ellis,  D.,  Flaum,  C.,  Roulet,  C.,  Marienbach,  E.  and  Seeman,  B.  The   by  permission  of  Society  of  Economic  Paleontologists  and  Mineralogists.
       Litho-Density  Tool  Calibration,  Paper  SPE  12048,  SP2 Ann.  Tech.  Conf.  and
       Exhibition,  1983,  Figure  10.12  pp.  214,  by  permission  of  Elsevier  Science
       Publishing  Co.  [nc.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11