Page 388 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 388

Judgmental Management Style
                                If  the  traditional  organizational  hierarchy  is  viewed  as  a  “chain-of-
                                command,” then ultimate authority resides in the top-most posi tion on
                                the organization chart. The individual occupying this position delegates
                                authority to subordinates who may, in turn, delegate authority to employ-
                                ees further down in the hierarchy. In this system, managers are expect ed
                                to  use  their  authority  to  get  the  work  done  via  command-and-control.
                                Action  is  based  on  the  manager’s  judgment.  This  system  effectively
                                requires that managers possess complete knowledge of the work being
                                done  by  their  subordinates—how  else  could  the  manager  “command-
                                and-control” the work? Of course, this omniscience does not exist. Thus,
                                managers  who  attempt  to  follow  this  metaphor  too  closely  find  them-
                                selves making decisions based on guesswork to a greater or lesser degree.
                                This results in mistakes, for which the managers are held accountable.
                                Managers who make too many mis takes may be fired, demoted, or disci-
                                plined. A natural response to this threat is fear, which may result in the
                                managers blaming their subordinates for their “failures.” Because of the
                                authoritarian mind-set, problems are ascribed to indi viduals, not systems.
                                This produces the classic approach to performance appraisal, including
                                ranking  of  employees,  merit  pay,  etc.  Another  outcome  is  acting  only
                                when  it  is  absolutely  necessary.  Since  actions  are  based  on  judgments,
                                judg ments can lead to mistakes, and mistakes are punished; managers
                                who  can  minimize  action  will  minimize  the  chance  that  mistakes  will
                                occur that can be blamed on them. Of course, this tendency is partially
                                offset by the threat of being blamed for not meeting goals set by higher
                                authorities.


                      Data-Based Management Style
                                One reaction to the obvious shortcomings of the judgmental management
                                style has been to try to improve the judgments by relying on “facts.” Man-
                                agers solicit feedback from employees and review data in reports before
                                making a decision. Ostensibly, this “data-based approach” changes the

                                                                                                 375






          19_Pyzdek_Ch19_p373-380.indd   375                                                            11/9/12   5:31 PM
   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393