Page 191 - The Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing
P. 191

Ethical Issues of Social Marketing and Persuasion                  183

                  An example of a social marketing claim that would not be acceptable as
               commercial speech would be the presentation of factual information in a
               way that implies that a disease or problem is more prevalent than it actually
               is, in order to create a sense of urgency among consumers. Another example
               would be presenting scientific information about which there is uncertainty
               and ambiguity in a manner that makes it appear to be “truth.” In corporate
               social marketing, some companies have implied in their cause-related adver-
               tisements that their donations to causes were substantial when they were
               actually giving very little (Andreasen & Drumwright, 2001). Note that U.S.
               law has determined that only misleading statements of fact are actionable. It
               has chosen not to regulate nonfactual aspects of advertising (e.g., subjective
               statements of opinion; “atmospherics,” such as the use of attractive people)
               on the “theory that they are nonfactual and that no reasonable consumer
               would be affected by such a claim” (Tushnet & Goldman, 2012, p. 161).
                  Advertising messages in electronic media are largely unaddressed by
               law. Electronic media have been characterized as “’The Wild West’—a
               rough and tough, no-holds-barred context in which the regulations, guide-
               lines and controls of traditional media are absent”—essentially, an envi-
               ronment in which anything goes (Drumwright & Murphy, 2009, p. 87).
               Nonprofits and public agencies have generally been enthusiastic adopters
               of electronic media because of the low cost in comparison to mass media,
               which increases the importance of ethical sensitivity in their use. Many of
               the ethical concerns have to do with the absence of checks and balances,
               the advertiser’s loss of control, a lack of transparency, and violations of
               privacy (Drumwright & Murphy, 2009). Particularly troubling ethical is-
               sues are raised by stealth marketing, which typically exposes consumers to
               promotional messages that they do not recognize as advertising. For exam-
               ple, social marketers who hire student interns to assume fake personas and
               send out favorable messages in an attempt to seed viral marketing are par-
               ticipating in stealth marketing.
                  Even though much social marketing is not subject to commercial speech
               regulation, social marketing messages should certainly meet—and, many
               would argue, exceed—the regulatory standards applied to commercial
               speech. Public reaction to a recent New York City Health Department anti-
               obesity campaign illustrates that some people have even higher standards
               for integrity and authenticity in social marketing than in commercial mar-
               keting. In a hard-hitting ad campaign against super-sized portions of fast
               food and sugary sodas, the New York City Health Department portrayed a
               diabetic with an amputated leg by electronically manipulating a stock
               photo of an able-bodied person instead of photographing an actual am-
               putee (McGeehan, 2012). Even though manipulating a photo is a common
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196