Page 30 - The Making of the German Post-war Economy
P. 30

INTRODUCTION                       3

           and political scientists have focused on Ludwig Erhard and his policies
                                                          12
           encapsulated in the concept of the Social Market Economy.  This meant
           that other German parties’ ideas and efforts to influence the post-war
           economic reconstruction were widely eclipsed.
             This  study seeks to illuminate the  individual academic and political
           approaches  of that  time. However, this research is confined to the
           activities of the three most  influential schools  of economic thought,
           namely the academically little researched  Arbeitsgemeinschaft Erwin von
           Beckerath (AGEvB) within the  Freiburg Circles,  the often misleadingly
                                                 13
           equated but distinctly different ordo-liberal Freiburg School with its main
           proponent Walter Eucken,   and, finally, the Cologne School  of
                                  14
           Economics around  Alfred Müller-Armack.  The reason for this
                                                15
           confinement is that other economic programmes and doctrines,
           principally Marxism  or communism, were either prevented by the
           occupying powers or were discredited and thus their influence remained
           negligible. Apart from German think tanks and individuals, naturally the
           major political parties gave  impulse  to and then shaped economic
           developments  in  occupied Germany. Thus, this book  includes the
           economic and socio-political conceptions of the socialist Sozialdemokratische
           Partei Deutschlands (SPD),  the conservative  Christlich Demokratische Union
                               16
           (CDU)  as well as the programmatically and organisationally different
                 17
           Bavarian  Christlich Soziale Union (CSU).  While the first two  Volksparteien
           (people’s parties) and their respective economic philosophies are relatively
           well researched, the socio-political and economic programme of the latter
           has received considerably less attention with a few  notable though
           incomplete exceptions.  Largely, this desideratum with regard to the CSU
                             18
           and Bavaria’s economic reconstruction seems due to the fact that more
           and more regional responsibilities were passed to the bizonal then trizonal
           Economic Council and to the widespread misconception that the CDU
                                              19
           and CSU shared the same economic policy.  Moreover, the liberal Freie
           Demokratische Partei (FDP) and the Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands (KPD)
           must be acknowledged as political alternatives distinct from the above-
           mentioned parties; but, both being small in size and with varying degrees
           of potential importance,  they have received relatively little attention  in
           academic research,  and informative publications on their socio-political
                          20
           and economic concepts are still missing.  With regard to the political
           parties and  their respective Fraktionen, i.e.  parliamentary  party groups in
           the first legislative  parliament in the Anglo-American  Bizone, the
           emerging Economic Council is also subject to examination. Although this
           research could draw on the edited minutes of the caucuses of the SPD
                                                                    21
           and CDU/CSU,  one should  not forget  that  these records had to  be
                        22
           submitted for approval to the Allied military authorities; therefore,
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35