Page 74 - The Making of the German Post-war Economy
P. 74

1.3


               THE COLOGNE SCHOOL AND

               SOCIAL MARKET ECONOMICS





                             The Social Market Economy as a regulative policy aims to combine,
                           on the basis of a competitive economy, free initiative and social progress. 1
                                                (Alfred Müller-Armack, 1956)

           In order to return to economic liberalism after more than a decade of a
           controlled economy, and in view of the absence of functioning  market
           principles in the immediate post-war years, the ordo-liberal competitive
           order was further developed by the Cologne School around the economist
           and anthropologist Alfred Müller-Armack who therefore coined the term
           ‘Soziale Marktwirtschaft’ (Social Market Economy) in a publication in
           December 1946.  Although it evolved from ordo-liberalism, this concept
                        2
           was  not identical  with the conception of the Freiburg School as it
           emphasised the state’s responsibility actively to improve the market
           condition and simultaneously to pursue a social balance.  In contrast to
                                                         3
           Eucken, who sought an answer to the  social question  by establishing  a
           functioning competitive order within a constitutional framework, Müller-
           Armack conceived the Social Market Economy as a regulatory policy idea
           aiming to combine free enterprise with a social  programme that is
           underpinned by market economic performance.  In putting social policy
                                                 4
           on a  par with economic policy, Müller-Armack’s concept was more
           emphatic regarding socio-political aims than the ordo-liberal economic
           concept. This dual principle  was also to be found in the name of the
           model. Although the adjective ‘social’ was often criticised as a decorative
                                                             5
           fig leaf or conversely, a gateway for antiliberal interventionism,  it meant
           more than simply distinguishing the concept from that of  laissez-faire
           capitalism on the one side and of ordo-liberal conceptions on the other.
                                                                    6
           In drawing  on Röpke’s anthropo-sociological approach of  an economic
           humanism leading to a ‘Civitas Humana’,  Müller-Armack pursued a
                                              7
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79