Page 188 - The Resilient Organization
P. 188

Postcard No. 2 from Hanover, New Hampshire                           175



           volunteers who had traveled to Iowa to help the campaign in the final
           week before the voting. His impassioned speech to these supporters was
           widely broadcast, replayed, and lampooned. It was singled out
           overnight as the moment that he lost all credible chance of winning his
           party’s nomination.
              One of Dean’s supporters in the audience, however, was a documen-
           tary film maker, and he recognized problems with the speech that was
           broadcast. The camera angle on Dean did not show the large, excited
           crowd surrounding the stage, missing the context of Dean’s remarks
           (which is why the film maker chose to shoot his own footage during the
           speech from within the crowd). The broadcast of Dean’s speech also
           muted the stomping and cheering of the crowd. As it was discovered
           later, it was due to a directional microphone that captured Dean raised
           voice to be heard above the crowd but without the crowd’s loud back-
           ground noise (and their visible excitement) to show why he was so loud
           and animated. The film maker quickly attempted to get his video public
           because it showed the Dean’s speech from the audience’s perspective:
           excited crowds that were cheering so loudly that the infamous broadcasted
           “scream” that Dean made was barely audible. The film maker says that
           many Dean supporters tried to help him get the video to the DFA cam-
           paign organization. Despite their efforts, there was no response.
              So the film maker put the video on his Web site for viewing. A link
           to the site was shared repeatedly by Dean supporters in the Blog for
           America comments space, and news spread of it. The grassroots-run
           Dean Rapid Response Network (another informal organization) put a
           link to the video on its Web site home page. Much traffic flooded the
           documentary film maker’s Web site. He began to get calls of complaint
           from his Internet service provider, and he concluded that he would have
           to remove the video from his site. His service charges were determined
           by the bandwidth that his Web site used, and the traffic to view the
           video was so high that he expected to owe $20,000 in several days, by
           the end of the week.
              Someone suggested that he set up a PayPal account, a service that
           facilitates the electronic transfer of funds using an existing credit card
           or checking account. He set up the account, receiving sufficient money

                                                                 (continued)
   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193