Page 100 - Cultural Studies Dictionary
P. 100

GLOCALIZATION



              radios, supermarkets and shopping centres. Further, patterns of population
              movement and settlement established during colonialism and its aftermath,
              combined with the more recent acceleration of globalization, particularly of
              electronic communications, have enabled increased cultural juxtapositioning,  77
              meeting and mixing. Indeed, all locales are now subject to the influences of distant
              places.
                 It is commonly argued that globalization is the consequence of the dynamism
              and inherently globalizing character of the institutions of modernity. Indeed,
              Giddens likens the institutions of modernity to an uncontrollable juggernaut of
              enormous power that sweeps away all that stands before it. In particular,
              globalization is to be grasped in terms of the expansionism of the world capitalist
              economy, the global information system, the nation-state system and the world
              military order. In this view, modernity originated in Western Europe and
              subsequently rolled out across the globe. However, this characterization has been
              subject to the criticism that it is Eurocentric, envisaging only one kind of modernity,
              that of the West. Instead, it can be argued that different spatial zones of the globe
              have become modern in a variety of ways requiring us to speak of global
              modernities in the plural.
                 Certainly, on the level of culture, globalization is far from an even process of
              Western expansion driven by economic imperatives. Rather, it is better
              characterized in terms of the disjunctive relationships between flows of money,
              technology, media, ideas and people. That is, globalization involves the dynamic
              movements of ethnic groups, technology, financial transactions, media images and
              ideological conflicts that are not neatly determined by one harmonious ‘master
              plan’. Rather, the speed, scope and impact of these flows are fractured and
              disconnected. Metaphors of uncertainty, contingency and chaos are replacing those
              of order, stability and systemacity. Globalization and global cultural flows cannot
              be understood through neat sets of linear determinations but are better
              comprehended as a series of overlapping, overdetermined, complex and chaotic
              conditions which, at best, cluster around key ‘nodal points’.

              Links City, cultural imperialism, glocalization, modernity, postcolonial theory

           Glocalization The concept of glocalization, in origin a marketing term, has been
              deployed to express the global production of the local and the localization of the
              global. The global and the local are mutually constituting, indeed, much that is
              considered to be local, and counterpoised to the global, is the outcome of translocal
              processes. For example, nation-states were forged within a global system and the
              contemporary rise in nationalist sentiment can be regarded as an aspect of
              globalization.
                 Further, the current direction of global consumer capitalism is such that it
              encourages limitless needs/wants whereby niche markets, customization and the
              pleasures of constant identity transformation give rise to a certain type of
              heterogeneity. Here the products of global forces are localized, that is, they are made
              pertinent to ‘local’ concerns. Thus, the global and the local are relative terms. The
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105