Page 115 - Cultural Studies Dictionary
P. 115

I












                Ideal speech situation This is a notion specifically associated with the philosophy
                   of Jürgen Habermas. Working within the tradition of critical theory, Habermas has
                   sought universal grounds for the validation of moral judgement and claims to
                   human emancipation. He does so by arguing that human social and cultural
                   interactions presuppose language and that in the very structure of speech we may
                   find the essential grounding conditions for all forms of social organization. When
                   we speak, argues Habermas, we are making four validity claims: namely, to
                   comprehensibility, truth, appropriateness and sincerity. These claims, he argues,
                   imply both the logical justification of truth and the social context for their
                   rational debate, the conditions for which Habermas calls an ‘ideal speech
                   situation’. Here competing truth-claims are subject to rational debate and
                   argument; that is, within an ideal speech situation truth is not subject to the
                   vested interests and power plays of truth seekers but rather emerges through the
                   process of argumentation. For Habermas, our very ability to make truth-claims is
                   dependent on a democratically organized public sphere that approximates an
                   ideal speech situation.
                      Some postmodern critics, particularly  Lyotard, have argued that Habermas’
                   notion of an ideal speech situation that underpins the public sphere reproduces the
                   totalizing discourse of ‘Enlightenment reason’, ignoring its repressive character.
                   That is to say, there can be no common or ideal speech situation since language and
                   culture are radically diverse in character and unavailable to either a single discursive
                   ethics or to a universal set of truth-claims. It could be countered that the purpose
                   of Habermas’ work does not lie in the final determination of common needs, but
                   centres on the possibility of intersubjective agreement concerning the very social
                   norms that allow different needs to be articulated and realized. That is, Habermas
                   would argue that he is stressing the importance of the democratic process rather
                   than the outcome of that process.
                   Links Communication, critical theory, Enlightenment, language, language-game, public
                   sphere

                Identification In everyday language the concept of identification involves the
                   processes of describing, naming and classifying. That is, to identify. Within cultural
                   studies this concept, while retaining aspects of this meaning, has also been deployed
                   in a more specifically psychoanalytic sense in relation to the construction of
                   identity. More particularly, identification is at the core of the processes of fantasy
                   and attachment that are said to partially suture or stitch together discourses and


                                                   92
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120