Page 191 - Cultural Studies Dictionary
P. 191

DICTIONARY OF CULTURAL STUDIES



                   that emphasizes the cultural construction of subjectivity. Whatever its strengths and
                   weaknesses, psychoanalysis must be taken as a historically specific account of
                   human sexuality and subjectivity.
         168
                   Links Identification, mirror phase, Oedipus complex, Other, phallocentric, subjectivity,
                   symbolic order

                Public sphere A space for democratic public debate and argument that mediates
                   between civil society and the state in which the public organizes itself and in which
                   ‘public opinion’ is formed. Within this sphere individuals are able to develop
                   themselves and engage in debate about the direction of society. The concept of the
                   public sphere plays a particularly important role in the work of Jürgen Habermas,
                   who traces its historical development from the rise of literary clubs, salons,
                   newspapers, political journals and institutions of political debate and participation
                   in eighteenth-century European ‘bourgeois society’. In this context, argues
                   Habermas, the public sphere was partially protected from both the church and the
                   state by the resources of private individuals. Here the public sphere was in principle,
                   though not in practice, open to all.
                      Habermas documents what he sees as the subsequent decline of the public
                   sphere in the face of the development of capitalism towards monopoly and the
                   strengthening of the state. The increased commodification of everyday life by giant
                   corporations and the proliferation of the non-rational products of the advertising
                   and public relations industries transform people from rational citizens into
                   consumers. In a parallel erosion of the public sphere, the state has taken increased
                   power over our lives through its economic role as a corporate manager and into the
                   private realm of the family, where it acts as the superintendent of welfare provision
                   and education. Nevertheless, Habermas attempts to ground the renewal of the
                   public sphere in the notion of an ‘ideal speech situation’ where competing truth-
                   claims are subject to rational debate and argument so that the public sphere is
                   conceived as a space for debate based on conversational equality.
                      There has been considerable criticism of the historical accuracy of Habermas’
                   account of the public sphere and of its male orientation. Further, some writers, such
                   as Giddens, have suggested that the modern media have actually expanded the
                   public sphere. More philosophically, some postmodern critics, particularly Lyotard,
                   have argued that Habermas reproduces the totalizing discourse of ‘Enlightenment
                   reason’ ignoring its repressive character. However, whatever the historical problems
                   with Habermas’ work, the idea of a public sphere retains a strong normative appeal.
                   Postmodernists, poststructuralists and neo-pragmatists would all think Habermas
                   mistaken in his attempt to construct a universal and transcendental rational
                   justification for the public sphere. Nevertheless, it can be justified on the pragmatic
                   grounds of cultural pluralism without the need for such a universalizing
                   epistemological defence.

                   Links Citizenship, Enlightenment, ideal speech situation, nation-state, politics, rationality
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196