Page 25 - Theory and Design of Air Cushion Craft
P. 25

10  Introduction  to  hovercraft

                 because I didn't know enough to be able to work out  the probable duct and other
                 losses and  the sort  of power  that  would be required.
                   Then  one Saturday  evening I thought I would have a look at using air curtains.
                 A  simple  calculation  looked  all  right  on  a power  basis,  and  so  that  Sunday  I
                made  up an  annular jet  using  two  coffee  tins, and found  that  the  air  did follow
                 the  'predicted'  path and that  there was a  'predicted'  gain in lift  -  very  exiting.

               Cockerell  secured  the  assistance  of  a  fellow  boatbuilder  in  constructing  a  working
              model  of  the  type  of  craft envisaged.  This  was used  as a test  model  for  several  years
               and  is now in the  Science  Museum  in London.  In  December  1955 Cockerell  applied
               for  his first British patent  covering  lift  by means  of  peripheral  annular jets.
                 Until  1956, air  cushion  technology  was considered  to  have military  potential  and
               was put  on  the  list  of  projects  which had  public information restrictions  when it was
               offered  to  the  British Government  for  development  sponsorship  by  Sir  Christopher
               Cockerell.  At  this  time,  study was centred  on  investigation  using  free  flying  models.
               For the next two years he made the rounds  of  industry and  government  departments
              with remarkably  little to show for it. The shipbuilding firms said  'It's not a ship -  try
               the  aircraft  industry',  and the aircraft firms said  'It's not an aircraft  -  try the  ship-
               builders'.  Three engine manufacturers  said 'Not for us, but if you want your invention
               taken  up,  remember  to use our  engines'.  However,  he did  receive valuable  encourage-
               ment from Mr  R. A.  Shaw of  the Ministry of  Supply, and  eventually during  1957 the
               Ministry  approached  Saunders-Roe  who accepted  a contract  to undertake  a feasibil-
               ity  study and  to do model  tests.
                The  Saunders-Roe  design  team  who  undertook  this  initial  study  also  formed  the
               nucleus  of  British Hovercraft Corporation's  technical staff  later  in  the  1960s. Prior  to
               involvement  with hovercraft  they had  for  many years  been  engaged  in  the  design  and
              construction  of flying boats and  hydrofoils.  It was precisely because of  this background
               of  'fish  and  fowl'  expertise that  the hovercraft principle was enthusiastically pursued.
                 Christopher  Cockerell  in  the  meantime  had  approached  the  National  Research
               Development  Corporation  (N.R.D.C.) who also realised  that hovercraft were likely to
               became  a  revolutionary  new  form  of  transport  and  through  them,  a  subsidiary
               Company  known as Hovercraft  Development  Limited (H.D.L.) was set up in January
               1958 with Cockerell  leading the  research  group  as Technical  Director.
                The  report  of  the  Saunders-Roe  feasibility  study  was  favourable,  as  a  result  of
              which N.R.D.C. placed  a further contract with the company for a programme  of work
              which  included  the  design  and  manufacture  of  a  manned  development  craft  desig-
              nated  SR.N1  (Fig.  1.9). This historic craft was completed  on 28th May  1959. On July
              25th  1959,  in its original form, it crossed  the  English Channel  from  Calais  to  Dover
              with Christopher  Cockerell  on board to mark  the  50th  anniversary of  the first cross-
              channel flight by Bleriot in an  aeroplane.
                Although  the first cross channel  operations  on  relatively calm water  were very suc-
              cessful,  the  craft  performance,  manoeuvrability,  seakeeping  quality  and  propulsion
              efficiency  were very poor. The craft had  an  air gap  over  the ground  of  about  100 mm
              whilst the  lift  power, at about  36.7 kW/t, was rather  high. The  efficiency  of  the air jet
              propulsion used  was low, and  manoeuvrability  was so poor that  the pilot  was unable
              to handle the craft in a stable manner. The SR.N1 was built in an aviation  factory, and
              aviation  engines, equipment,  structures  and  construction  technology  were used.  For
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30