Page 84 - INTRODUCTION TO THE CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS
P. 84

Hamilton-Jacobi equation                                           71

                   Proof. Since (2.19) holds we have, for every (x, α) ∈ [a, b] × R,

                         d
                                                                           0
                    0=     [S α (x, u (x) ,α)] = S xα (x, u (x) ,α)+ S uα (x, u (x) ,α) u (x) .
                        dx
                From (2.14) we obtain, for every (x, u, α) ∈ [a, b] × R × R,
                                 d
                         0=        [S x (x, u, α)+ H (x, u, S u (x, u, α))]
                                dα
                            = S xα (x, u, α)+ H v (x, u, S u (x, u, α)) S uα (x, u, α) .
                Combining the two identities (the second one evaluated at u = u (x)), with the
                hypothesis S uα (x, u, α) 6=0,weget
                         u (x)= H v (x, u (x) ,S u (x, u (x) ,α)) , ∀ (x, α) ∈ [a, b] × R
                          0
                as wished. We still need to prove that v = −H u .Differentiating v we have, for
                                                   0
                every (x, α) ∈ [a, b] × R,
                                            0
                 v (x)= S xu (x, u (x) ,α)+ u (x) S uu (x, u (x) ,α)
                  0
                        = S xu (x, u (x) ,α)+ H v (x, u (x) ,S u (x, u (x) ,α)) S uu (x, u (x) ,α) .
                Appealing, once more, to (2.14) we obtain, for every (x, u, α) ∈ [a, b] × R × R,

                       d
                0=       [S x (x, u, α)+ H (x, u, S u (x, u, α))]
                      du
                   = S xu (x, u, α)+ H u (x, u, S u (x, u, α)) + H v (x, u, S u (x, u, α)) S uu (x, u, α) .
                Combining the two identities (the second one evaluated at u = u (x))we infer
                the result, namely

                        0
                       v (x)= −H u (x, u (x) ,S u (x, u (x) ,α)) = −H u (x, u (x) ,v (x)) .
                This achieves the proof of the theorem.
                                       1
                Example 2.20 Let g ∈ C (R) with g (u) ≥ g 0 > 0.Let
                                                  1  2
                                         H (u, v)=  v − g (u)
                                                  2
                be the Hamiltonian associated to
                                                 1  2
                                        f (u, ξ)=  ξ + g (u) .
                                                 2
                The Hamilton-Jacobi equation and its reduced form are given by
                                   1    2               1   ∗ 2
                              S x +  (S u ) − g (u)= 0 and  (S ) = g (u) .
                                                            u
                                   2                    2
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89