Page 228 - Thermal Hydraulics Aspects of Liquid Metal Cooled Nuclear Reactors
P. 228

Subchannel analysis for LMR                                       199


                     Table 5.2 Summary of transversal exchange between subchannels
                     Directed cross flow            (A) Diversion cross flow
                                                    (B) Flow sweeping
                     Undirected flow fluctuation    (C) Turbulent mixing
                                                    (D) Flow scattering
                                                    (E) Large-scale oscillation


           Diversion cross flow
           Diversion cross flow is resulted by the pressure difference between two neighboring
           subchannels and directed from the subchannel with higher pressure to the subchannel
           with lower pressure. Usually, it is treated in the same manner as local hydraulic
           resistance:

                        G ∗ 2
                         ij
               △p ij ¼ k ij                                               (5.33)
                        2 ρ
           The local pressure-drop coefficient k ij depends on rod-bundle geometry and flow con-
           ditions and is normally specified by the user of SCTH codes.


           Flow sweeping
           Flow sweeping is resulted by structural inserts such as wire wraps due to their geo-
           metric structure leading to the change in the average velocity direction. In LMRs,
           sweeping flow makes the main contribution to the entire transversal exchange, trans-
           ports the energy from one subchannel to another one, and flattens the temperature
           distribution in the fuel assembly. Generally, it is assumed that the sweeping flow
           velocity is proportional to the axial-flow velocity and inversely proportional to
           the wire pitch:
                 ∗
               G  s ij  H
                 ij
                       ¼ C w                                              (5.34)
                  m ij
           Based on experimental measurements, it is found that the coefficient C W depends on
           the geometric parameters and has the value in the range 0.2–0.4, averaged over the
           entire wire pitch. Cheng and Todreas (1982) proposed the following equation:


               C w ¼ 0:562
                         0:5    0:5
                 P D        A r         H        ð P DÞ  D + D w Þ
                                                        ð
                   p ffiffiffi         q ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi     (5.35)
                 P= 3       A s     2       2   2      A s
                                   π D + D w Þ + H
                                     ð
                   p ffiffiffi
                     3  2  π  D 2
               A s ¼   P                                                  (5.36)
                    4        8
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233