Page 29 - Understanding Flight
P. 29

CH02_Anderson  7/25/01  8:55 AM  Page 16




                 16  CHAPTER TWO




                    Daniel Bernoulli did not derive  trailing edge. Since the wing has a hump on the top, the air
                    the “Bernoulli equation.” His  going over the top travels farther. Thus it must go faster to
                    friend Leonid Euler did.  rejoin at the trailing edge. The description is complete.
                                                 This is a tidy explanation and it is easy to understand. But
                                       one way to judge an explanation is to see how general it is. Here one
                                       starts to encounter some troubles. If this description gives us a true
                                       understanding of lift, how do airplanes fly inverted? How do
                                       symmetric wings (the same shape on the top and the bottom) fly?
                                       How does a wing flying at a constant speed adjust for changes in load,
                                       such as in a steep turn or as fuel is consumed? One is given more
                                       questions than answers by the popular description of lift.
                                         One might also ask if the numbers calculated by the popular
                                       description really work. Let us look at an example. Take a Cessna 172,
                                       which is a popular, high-winged, four-seat airplane. The wings must
                                       lift 2300 lb (1045 kg) at its maximum flying weight. The path length
                                       for the air over the top of the wing is only about 1.5 percent greater
                                       than the length under the wing. Using the popular description of lift,
                                       the wing would develop only about 2 percent of the needed lift at 65
                                       mi/h (104 km/h), which is “slow flight” for this airplane. In fact, the
                                       calculations say that the minimum speed for this wing to develop
                                       sufficient lift is over 400 mi/h (640 km/h). If one works the problem
                                       the other way and asks what the difference in path length would have
                                       to be for the popular description to account for lift in slow flight, the
                                       answer would be 50 percent. The thickness of the wing would be
                                       almost the same as the chord length.
                                         Though enthusiastically taught, there is clearly something seriously
                                       wrong with the popular description of lift. The first thing that is wrong
                                       is that the principle of equal transit times is not true for a wing with lift.
                                       It is true only for a wing without lift. Figure 2.1 shows a computer
                                       simulation of the airflow around a wing. Periodically simulated smoke
                                       has been introduced to show the changes in the speed of the airflow.
                                              The first thing to notice is that the air going over the top of the
                    The principle of equal transit  wing reaches the trailing edge before the air that goes under the
                    times is not true for a wing  wing. In fact, the air that passed under the wing has a
                    with lift.                somewhat retarded velocity compared to the velocity of air
                                              some distance from the wing. Without the principle of equal
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34