Page 43 - Volcano and Geothermal Tourism
P. 43

20     Introduction



               accidents  and  emergencies,  sometimes  with  dire   1   a hazard zone map which highlights areas to
               consequences  for  both  the  tourist  and  the  host   avoid;
               community.                                  2   possible escape routes;
                  One of the remaining questions is, what and   3   symbols and pictograms to indicate key points
               how  much  is  done  to  prevent  accidents?  This   (shelters, first aid, emergency phones etc);
               brings  us  to  the  range  of  initial  risk  prevention   4   emergency contacts.
               measures, both by the volcano tourist and the local
               authorities  in  charge. Whereas  local  residents  in   These could be developed as a general template
               active volcanic regions are generally made aware   and applied to every region – which would also
               of  any  potential  dangers  and  hazards,  travellers   create familiarity with the use of such information.
               rarely  have  this  information  and  are  not  always   Hazard mapping is considered as one of the most
               aware of local safety guidelines, emergency shelters   effective  ways  to  reduce  hazard  exposure  and
               and  evacuation  procedures  should  the  need  for   therefore  casualties  in  high-risk  zones  (Blong,
               them  arise.  These  considerations  open  the   2000; Calvache, 2001; Chester et al, 2001; Francis
               discussion  as  to  whether  there  should  be   and Oppenheimer, 2004; Marti and Ernst, 2005;
               international  standard  guidelines  about  safety  on   Leonard et al, 2008) and an essential tool in the
               volcanoes  which  can  be  adapted  for  individual   communication of volcanic risk between scientists,
               regions.                                    the local authorities and the public (Felpeto et al,
                  Despite these sobering thoughts people will   2007; Haynes et al, 2007; Nakamura et al, 2008).
               not  be  stopped  by  disasters  happening  in  other   Japanese  authorities,  for  example,  have
               areas;  on  the  contrary,  catastrophic  events   developed a number of similar maps and booklets
               unfortunately seem to have the opposite effect of   for  local  residents  and  visitors  to  volcanic  areas.
               drawing  attention  to  a  certain  region. The  first   These  areas  have  designed  individual  disaster
               objective therefore should be to make tourism in   prevention  handbooks,  available  on  the  Internet,
               every  volcanic  and  geothermal  area  as  safe  as   with only some of them already available in more
               possible. The second objective should be to provide   than one language (Figure 1.5). In the case of no
               essential  information  to  all  people  who  visit   imminent danger volcano tourists are more likely
               active  volcanic  environments,  and  the  third   to ignore warnings and safety information, if they
               objective to develop international guidelines for   are given any at all, behavioural patterns which have
               visitor  safety  in  active  volcanic  and  geothermal   been  established  through  observation  of  tourist
               environments.                               behaviour as well as personal communication with
                                                           volcano tourists in several countries (Erfurt-Cooper
               Suggestions for international safety        and Heggie, 2008; see also Faulkner, 2001).
                                                              By now it is rather obvious that most regions
               guidelines for visitors                     have  an  individual  approach  to  risk  and  disaster
               While  a  number  of  individual  regions,  national   management. Dealing with increased volcanic activity
               parks  and  other  designated  natural  areas  have   can include the closure of a national park for a period
               developed  their  own  strategies  for  dealing  with   of time, as has happened in the Volcán Poás National
               potential hazards for visitors, it is very important   Park in Costa Rica, where the most visited and most
               to advance from risk management plans only for   economically  important  park  in  the  country  had
               local  residents  to  the  inclusion  of  temporary   visitation  limited  for  three  weeks  by  the  park
               visitors. In order to make important information   administration  (Aguirre  and  Ahearn,  2007).  New
               available to every visitor a simple fact sheet of one   Zealand is another country where volcanic eruptions
               page,  printed  on  both  sides,  which  offers  visual   have  affected  tourism  in  the  past.  Every  time  Mt
               recognition of signs, maps and symbols to avoid   Ruapehu  erupts,  surrounding  communities,
               language  barriers,  may  prove  sufficient.  A  fact   agricultural  land,  air  and  road  traffic  are  affected
               sheet  (Appendix  3)  can  be  divided  into  four   (Paton  et  al,  1998),  and  this  of  course  affects  the
               sections to display the necessary information on   tourism industry through loss of revenue from winter
               half a page for each of the following:      sports and general sightseeing (Miller et al, 1999).







       Ch01.indd   20                                                                              3/28/2010   1:26:18 PM
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48