Page 101 - CULTURE IN THE COMMUNICATION AGE
P. 101

MIRJA  LIIKKANEN

             institutional spaces of the public domain, and it is in these public spaces that
             men and women are sorted into hierarchies. Yet it is also precisely in the public
             spaces – when I am traveling or shopping, for instance, or when I attend an art
             exhibition or go to a theater – where I can feel free, where I am coasting
             (without a body?), that I am safe (from what?). Are these truly the moments
             when I forget the restricting marks that culture has imprinted on my body,
             when I feel I part of a universal humanity, when I am a free and autonomous
             individual?
               And what about home, the private spaces? Is that the domain where women
             have the necessary and appropriate ‘cultural competence’, where we can escape
             the critical evaluations we face elsewhere? Or is the private space really just the
             ‘golden cage’ that history inscribes as ‘the female domain’, where we again feel
             guilty and inadequate?
               Generations  of  women  everywhere  have  shared,  and  continue  to  share,
             common experience. Almost everywhere in the world women remain sub-
             ordinated in their social groups. But to understand the phenomenon more
             deeply, we must also take into account how culture mediates gender as well as
             the different histories between groups of women according to race, ethnicity,
             age, and social class.
               Everything  in  culture  –  geographical  places,  social  institutions,  work  set-
             tings, everyday habits, leisure-time hobbies, and all the rest – is gendered. In
             most societies, everything connected to the feminine carries certain negative
             qualities, while the masculine is embedded with numerous positive qualities.
             This  troubling,  systemic  complex  of  discrimination  derives  from  the  fact
             that, while gender is a structural and ideological question, it also exists as a
             highly  personalized,  intimate  system  of  everyday  practises  in  public  and  in
             private,  to  which  every  one  of  us  has  a  personal  position  and  relationship.
             Gender articulates deeply into our emotions, love, affection, dependency, and
             sexuality.
               In this chapter I take up two main themes: how gender is represented and
             lived  in  Western  culture,  especially  in  my  cultural  homeland,  Finland,  and,
             second, how gender has been evaluated and theorized in women’s research.
             Gender as a public discourse is created in concrete professional practices and
             discussions.  That  is  why  this  chapter  will  deal  rather  extensively  with  the
             politics of knowing about gender and culture, in particular the practices of
             research  on  gender,  and  the  representations  of  gender  that  such  research
             produces. (See also Widerberg 1995.)
               I will stress the central point that, despite having a biological appearance,
             gender  as  a  sociocultural  phenomenon  is  an  ideological issue that is directly
             connected  to  questions  of  dominance  and  power  in  society  –  both  in  the
             symbolic and in the more formal senses.
               Moreover, like gender itself, research on gender is greatly in fluenced by the
             cultures that produce it. Consequently, when research and theory on gender
             travels around the world it does not necessarily harmonize with the cultural

                                            90
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106