Page 235 - CULTURE IN THE COMMUNICATION AGE
P. 235

STEVE  JONES  AND  STEPHANIE  KUCKER

             Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, R., and Turo ff, M. (1986). ‘Experiments in group decision-making:
                Communication  process  and  outcome  in  face-to-face  versus  computerized
                conferences’. Human Communication Research, 13, 225–52.
             Jones, S. (1995). Cybersociety. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
             —— (1997a). Virtual Culture. London: Sage Publications.
             —— (1997b). ‘The Internet, communication and electromotion’. In A. Roesler (ed.),
                Mythos Internet. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
             —— (1998). Cybersociety 2.0. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
             —— (2000). ‘The cyber and the subjective’. In A. Gordo-Lopez and I. Parker (eds),
                Cyberpsychology. New York: Macmillan.
             Kiesler, S. (1997). Cultures of the Internet. Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
             Kiesler,  S.,  Siegel,  J.,  and  McGuire,  T.  W.  (1984).  ‘Social  psychological  aspects  of
                computer-mediated communication’. American Psychologist, 39: 1123–34.
             Kundera, M. (1990). L’immortalité. Paris: Gallimard.
             Nardi, B. and O’Day, V. (1999). Information Ecologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
             Nye, D. (1997). Narratives and Spaces. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
             Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier.
                New York: Harper.
             Rice, R. E. and Love, G. (1987). ‘Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a
                computer-mediated network’. Communication Research, 14: 85–108.
             Rice, R. E., Grant, A. E., Schmitz, J., and Torobin, J. (1990). ‘Individual and network
                influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging’.  Social
                Networks, 12: 27–55.
             Robins, K. (1995). ‘Cyberspace and the world we live in’. In M. Featherstone (ed.),
                Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk. London: Sage Publications.
             Salus, P. (1995). Casting the Net. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
             Schmitz, J. and Fulk, J. (1991). ‘Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic
                mail’. Communication Research 18: 487–523.
             Smith, M. and Kollock, P. (1999). Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge.
             Sproull, L. and Faraj, S. (1997). ‘Atheism, sex, and databases: The Net as a social tech-
                nology’. In S. Kielser (ed.), Cultures of the Internet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
             Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1986). ‘Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in
                organizational communication’. Management Science, 32: 1492–512.
             Steinfeld,  C.  W.  (1985).  ‘Computer-mediated  communication  in  an  organizational
                setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses’. In M. L. McLaughlin (ed.),
                Communication Yearbook 9. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
             Sterne, J. (1999). ‘Thinking the Internet: Cultural studies vs. the Millennium’. In S. Jones
                (ed.), Doing Internet Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
             Strate, L., Jacobson, R., and Gibson, S. B. (1996). ‘Meaning: Cybercommunication and
                cyberculture’. In L. Strate, R. Jacobson, and S. B. Gibson (eds),  Communication and
                Cyberspace. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
             Turkle, S. (1999). ‘Tinysex and gender trouble’. In Liberty (ed.), Liberating Cyberspace.
                London: Pluto Press.
             Virnoche, M. E. and Marx, G. T. (1997). ‘“Only connect”: E. M. Forster in an age of
                electronic communication: Computer-mediated communication and community
                networks’. Sociological Inquiry, 67: 85–100.
             Walther,  J.  B.  (1992).  ‘Interpersonal  e ffects  in  computer-mediated  interaction:  A
                relational perspective’. Communication Research, 19: 52–90.

                                           224
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240