Page 336 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 336

320  4 Life Cycle Impact Assessment

                      Available Practice in Life Cycle Assessment  in K.J. Thom´ e-Kozmiensky (Hrsg.)), EF-
                      of Climate Change, Stratospheric Ozone  Verlag f¨ ur Energie- und Umwelttechnik,
                      Depletion, Photo-oxidant Formation, Acid-  Berlin, pp. 336–340.
                      ification, and Eutrophication. Backgrounds  Kl¨ opffer, W. and Wagner, B.O. (2007a)
                      on Specific Impact Categories.RIVMReport  Atmospheric Degradation of Organic
                      550015003/2001, Directiorate-General of  Substances – Data for Persistence and
                      the National Institute of Public Health and  Long-range Transport Potential, Wiley-VCH
                      the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, NL,  Verlag GmbH, Weinheim.
                      http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/  Kl¨ opffer, W. and Wagner, B.O. (2007b) Per-
                      550015003.html (accessed 17 October  sistence revisited. Editorial. Environ. Sci.
                      2013).                          Pollut. Res., 14 (3), 141–142.
                    Kl¨ opffer, W., Potting, J., and Meilinger, S.  Koellner, T. (2000) Species-pool effect poten-
                      (2001b) in Best Available Practice in Life  tials (SPEP) as a yardstick to evaluate
                      Cycle Assessment of Climate Change, Strato-  land-use impacts on biodiversity. J. Clean.
                      spheric Ozone Depletion, Photo-oxidant  Prod., 8, 293–311.
                      Formation, Acidification, and Eutrophi-
                                                     Koellner, T., de Baan, L., Beck, T., Brandao,
                      cation. Backgrounds on Specific Impact
                                                      M., Civit, B., Margni, M., Mil` a i Canals,
                      Categories (eds W. Kl¨ opffer,J.Potting,
                                                      L., Saad, R., Maia de Souza, D., and
                      J. Sepp¨ al¨ a, J. Risbey, S. Meilinger, G.  M¨ uller-Wenk, R. (2013a) UNEP-SETAC
                      Norris, L.-G. Lindfors, and M. Goedkoop),  guideline on global land use impact
                      Chapter 3, RIVM Report 550015003/2001,  assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem
                      RIVM, Bilthoven, NLS. 37–50,    services in LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 18
                      http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/
                                                      (6), 1188–1202.
                      550015003.html (accessed 17 October
                                                     Koellner, T., de Baan, L., Beck, T.,
                      2013).
                                                      Brandao, M., Goedkoop, M., Margni,
                    Kl¨ opffer, W. and Renner, I. (1995)  M., Mil` a i Canals, L., M¨ uller-Wenk, R.,
                      Methodik der Wirkungsbilanz im Rah-  Weidema, B., and Wittstock, B. (2013b)
                      men von Pro¬dukt- ¨ Okobilanzen unter  Principles for life cycle inventories of land
                      Ber¨ucksichtigung nicht oder nur schwer quan-  use on a global scale. Int. J. Life Cycle
                      tifizierbarer Umwelt-Kategorien,UBA-Texte  Assess., 18 (6), 1203–1215.
                      23/95, Bericht der C.A.U. GmbH, Dreie-
                                                     Koellner, T. and Geyer, R. (2013) Special
                      ich, an das Umweltbundesamt (UBA),
                                                      Issue: Global land use impacts on biodi-
                      Berlin. ISSN: 0722-186X.
                                                      versity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int.
                    Kl¨ opffer, W. and Renner, I. (2007) Leben-
                                                      J. Life Cycle Assess., 18 (6), 1185–1277.
                      szyklusbasierte Nachhaltigkeitsbewer-
                                                     Koellner, T. and Scholz, R.W. (2007) Assess-
                      tung von Produkten. Technikfolgenab-
                                                      ment of land use impacts on the natural
                      sch¨atzung – Theorie Prax., 16 (3), 32–38.
                                                      environment. Part 1. An analytical frame-
                    Kl¨ opffer, W., Renner, I., Tappeser, B.,
                      Eckelkamp, C., and Dietrich, R. (1999) Life  work for pure land accupation and land
                      Cycle Assessment gentechnisch ver¨anderter  use change. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 12 (1),
                      Produkte als Basis f¨ur eine umfassende  16–23.
                      Beurteilung m¨oglicher Umweltauswirkungen,  Koellner, T. and Scholz, R.W. (2008) Assess-
                      Monographien, Bd. 111, Umweltbun-  ment of land use impacts on the natural
                      desamt GmbH/ Federal Environment  environment. Part 2. Generic characteri-
                      Agency Ltd., Wien. ISBN: 3-85457-475-4.  zation factors for local species diversity in
                    Kl¨ opffer, W. and Schmidt, E. (2003) Com-  central Europe. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 13
                      parative determination of the persistence  (1), 32–48.
                      of semivolatile organic compounds (SOC)  Koroneos, C.J., Rovas, D.D. and Dompros,
                      using SimpleBox 2.0 and Chemrange  A.Th. (eds) (2011) Proceedings of ELCAS
                      1.0/2.1. Fresenius Environ. Bull. (FEB), 12  2011, 2nd International Exergy, Life Cycle
                      (6), 490–496.                   Assessment and Sustainability Workshop
                    Kl¨ opffer, W. and Volkwein, S. (1995) in  and Symposium. Final Conference of Cost
                      Enzyklop¨adie der Kreislaufwirtschaft, Man-  Action C24, Nisyros Island, Greece, June
                      agement der Kreislaufwirtschaft (Kapitel 6.4  19–21, 2011.
   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341