Page 332 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition

316 4 Life Cycle Impact Assessment

Guin´ ee, J., Heijungs, R., van Oers, L., van Heijungs, R. (1995) Harmonisation of meth-
de Meent, D., Vermeire, T., and Rikken, ods for impact assessment. Environ. Sci.
M. (1996b) LCA impact assessment of Pollut. Res., 2 (4), 217–224.
toxic releases, in Generic Modelling of Heijungs, R. and Guin´ ee, J. (1993) CML on
Fate, Exposure and Effect for Ecosystems actual versus potential risks. LCA News- A
and Human Beings with Data for About SETAC- Eur. Publ., 3 (4), 4.
100 Chemicals. Report by, CML, Leiden Heijungs, R., Guin´ ee, J.B., Huppes, G.,
and RIVM, Bilthoven to the Dutch Min- Lamkreijer, R.M., Udo de Haes, H.A.,
istry of Housing, Spatial Planning and
Wegener Sleeswijk, A., Ansems, A.M.M.,
Environment. Eggels, P.G., van Duin, R., and de Goede,
Guin´ ee, J.B., de Koning, A., Pennington,
H.P. (1992) Environmental Life Cycle Assess-
D.W., Rosenbaum, R., Hauschild, M.,
ment of Products. Guide (Part 1) and
Olsen, S.I., Molander, S., Bachmann,
Backgrounds (Part 2) October 1992,Pre-
T.M., and Pant, R. (2004) Bringing sci-
pared by , CML, TNO and B&G, Leiden.
ence and pragmatism together. A tiered
approach for modelling toxicological English Version 1993.
Heijungs, R., Guin´ ee, J., Kleijn, R., and
impacts in LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 9
Rovers, V. (2007) Bias in normalization:
(5), 320–326.
causes, consequences, detection and
Guin´ ee, J.B., Van Oers, L., De Koning,
A. and Tamis, W. (2006) Life Cycle Remedies. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 12 (4),
Approaches for Conservation Agricul- 211–216.
ture. CML Report 171, CML, Leiden, Held, M. and Geißler, K.A. (eds) (1993)
http://www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/ssp/index.html ¨ Okologie der Zeit, Edition Universitas, S.
(accessed 16 October 2013). Hirzel, Stuttgart. ISBN: 3-8047-1264-9.
Hauschild, M.Z., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Jolliet, Held, M. and Geißler, K.A. (1995) Von
O., MacLeod, M., Margni, M., van de Rhythmen und Eigenzeiten. Perspektiven
Meent, D., Rosenbaum, R.K., Russel, einer ¨ Okologie der Zeit, Edition Universitas,
A., and McKone, T.E. (2008) Building a S. Hirzel, Stuttgart. ISBN: 3-8047-1414-5.
consensus model for life cycle impact Held, M. and Kl¨ opffer, W. (2000) Life cycle
assessment of chemicals: the search for assessment without time? Time matters in
harmony and parsimony. Environ. Sci. life cycle assessment. Gaia, 9, 101–108.
Technol., 42 (19), 7032–7036. Henderson, A.D., Hauschild, M.Z., van de
Hauschild, M.Z., Jolliet, O., and Huijbregts, Meent, D., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Larsen,
M.A.J. (2011) A bright future for address- H.F., Margni, M., McKone, T.E., Payet, J.,
ing chemical emissions in life cycle Rosenbaum, R.K., and Jolliet, O. (2011)
assessment. Editorial special issue USEtox. USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 16 (8), 697–700.
comparative assessment of toxic emissions
Hauschild, M. and Potting, J. (2001) Spa-
in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key
tial Differentiation in Life Cycle Impact
chemical properties. Special issue USEtox.
Assessment; Guidance Document,Dan-
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 16 (8), 701–709.
ish Environmental Protection Agency,
Hertwich, E.G. (1997) Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.,
Copenhagen.
Hauschild, M.Z., Potting, J., Hertel, O., 2 (2), 62, Comment to Hogan, L.M., Beal,
R.T. and Hunt, R.G. (1996) Threshold
Sch¨ opp, W., and Bastrup-Birk, A. (2006)
inventory interpretation methodology. A
Spatial differentiation in the charac-
terisation of photochemical ozone case study of three juice container sys-
formation – the EDIP2003 methodol- tem. Int. J. LCA, 1 (3), 159–167, Reply by
ogy. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 11 (1) Special Hunt,R.G.S.63.
Issue, 72–80. Hertwich, E., Matales, S.F., Pease, W.S.,
Hauschild, M. and Wenzel, H. (1998) Envi- and McKones, T.E. (2001) Human toxicity
ronmental Assessment of Products: Scientific potentials for life-cycle assessment and
Background, vol. 2, Chapman & Hall, toxic release inventory risk screening.
London. ISBN: 0-412-80810-2. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 20, 928–939.