Page 378 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 378

362  6 From LCA to Sustainability Assessment

                      An improvable phase of LCA, particularly with respect to sustainability assess-
                    ment, is the impact assessment, the elaboration of which has deliberately been
                    left open by ISO. In Chapter 4 numerous new developments, which are still being
                    tested, have been discussed. A mismatch concerning the impacts of emissions of
                    chemical origin and other emissions or stressors should be indicated here. 28)  To
                    illustrate this situation, impact categories that are arranged differently by from the
                                                               29)
                    usual mode (Section 4.5), and two categories are added :
                       A: Consumption of resources
                       B: Impacts of chemical emissions
                       C: Impacts of physical emissions
                       D: Impacts of biological emissions
                       E: Other impacts.

                       A: Consumption of resources
                         A1: Consumption of abiotic resources (including water)
                         A2: Consumption of biotic resources
                         A3: Land use.
                      These categories are entirely compatible to input related impact categories of the
                    Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden (CML) method. 30)
                       B: Impact of chemical emissions
                         B1: Climate change
                         B2: Stratospheric ozone depletion
                         B3: Formation of photo-oxidants
                         B4: Acidification
                         B5: Eutrophication
                         B6: Human toxicity
                         B7: Eco-toxicity
                         B8: Odour.
                      Comprising eight impact categories, often with additional subcategories, 31)  this
                    group is the strongest and practically dominates every impact assessment by
                    the number of components. This ‘chemical preponderance’ is undoubtedly an
                    unintended side-effect of the triumph of the CML method. 32)

                       C: Impacts of physical emissions
                         C1: Noise
                         C2: Ionising radiation (radioactivity)
                         C3: Waste heat.
                      This group, practically not considered much, comprises physical emissions,
                    which may have secondary physiological and psychological impacts.

                    28)  This lead to the false impression that chemistry is the base of noxity, see Kl¨ opffer (2003b).
                    29)  Kl¨ opffer and Renner (2003) and Kl¨ opffer (2006a).
                    30)  Heijungs et al. (1992) and Guin´ ee et al. (2002).
                    31)  Guin´ ee et al. (2002).
                    32)  Kl¨ opffer (2006b).
   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383