Page 194 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 194

180                                               R.K. Rosenbaum et al.

            directly linked to the original cause). Contrary to a frequent misconception, that does
            not mean that the total uncertainty (i.e. including all its sources, not just parameter and
            model uncertainty) of an indicator increases when going further down the cause–effect
            chain, because the increase in parameter and model uncertainty is compensated by an
            increase in environmental relevance. If the latter is low (as is the case for indicators
            placed early in the cause–effect chain) the relationship of an indicator to an envi-
            ronmental issue is assumed but not modelled and thus hypothetical and therefore
            uncertain. A detailed discussion on these issues can be found in Chap. 11.
              To select the impact indicator, developers must therefore strike a compromise
            between choosing an indicator of impact:
            1. Early in the environmental mechanism, giving a more measurable (e.g. in the
              lab) result but with less environmental relevance and more remote from the
              concerns directly observable in the environment

              Versus
            2. 2. Downstream in the environmental mechanism, giving more relevant but hardly
              verifiable information (e.g. degraded ecosystems, affected human lifetime)

              This has led to the establishment of two different types of impact categories,
            applying indicators on two different levels of the environmental mechanism: mid-
            point impact indicators (representing option 1 from above) and endpoint impact
            indicators (representing option 2).


            10.2.3.6  Midpoint Impact Indicators

            When the impact assessment is based on midpoint impact indicators, the classifi-
            cation gathers the inventory results into groups of substance flows that have the
            ability to contribute to the same environmental effect in preparation for a more
            detailed assessment of potential impacts of the environmental interventions,
            applying the characterisation factors that have been developed for the concerned
            impact category. For example, all elementary flows of substances that may have a
            carcinogenic effect on humans will be classified in the same midpoint category
            called “toxic carcinogen” and the characterisation will calculate their contribution to
            this impact. Typical (and emerging) midpoint categories (including respective
            sub-categories/impact pathways) are:
            • Climate change
            • Stratospheric ozone depletion
            • Acidification (terrestrial, freshwater)
            • Eutrophication (terrestrial, freshwater, marine)
            • Photochemical ozone formation
            • Ecotoxicity (terrestrial, freshwater, marine)
            • Human toxicity (cancer, non-cancer)
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199