Page 324 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 324

9781412934633-Chap-20  1/10/09  8:53 AM  Page 295





                                              MODELING OF DIGITAL FUTURES                    295


                    Educated urban elites from currency-weak  chances, access quality, and opportunities for
                    countries appear on the same side of the dig-  usage.
                    ital divide as the middle classes of post-  Studies of Internet access in the USA
                    industrial countries. Digital inequalities exist  during the late 1990s pointed to a ‘digital
                    across and within countries.            divide’ along the lines of income, education,
                      A brief glimpse at the diffusion patterns of  age, gender, and rural/urban (US Department
                    television sets can provide some indication  of Commerce, 1995, 1998).  According to
                    of the ability to save up funds over long peri-  more recent data however, these divides tend
                    ods of time to acquire a popular but some-  to disappear, except for the most disadvan-
                    what costly electronic device. Television sets  taged parts of the population, including the
                    are appliances that depend neither on a wired  poor and the disabled (US Department of
                    infrastructure nor on sophisticated skills for  Commerce, 2000). Yet digital inequalities are
                    their use, and they have had several decades  not only a matter of having or not having
                    for their diffusion. While the average number  basic access, but also a qualitative issue with
                    of TV sets per 100 inhabitants is well above  educational and socio-economic aspects,
                    80 in the USA, the equivalent figures in the  beyond technological aspects narrowly con-
                    Latin American countries mentioned above  ceived.  What one can do with access,
                    range from 14% to 32%. The diffusion rates  depends on the bandwidth and speed, on nav-
                    for  TV sets illustrate the limitations of  igational skills (Hargittai, 2001), and the
                    market-driven distribution models insofar as  capacities to process information critically
                    they show that these electronic devices could  and communicate effectively within multi-
                    be obtained by some part of the population  media environments. In addition, more and
                    but not by others, and that the portion of the  more commercial service sites require extra-
                    population that was able to acquire them is  payments for access; while the expanding
                    several times smaller than that in the USA.  corporate intranets are password protected
                                                            and off-limits to outsiders (Sassen, 1997).
                                                            Whereas findings valid for the USA case
                                                            might not be totally different from those for
                    DIGITAL INEQUALITIES                    other post-industrial countries, these cannot
                                                            be further generalized to cover the situation
                    Whereas much of the emerging sociology of  in the global South which seems to be strik-
                    cyberspace has focused on domestic aspects  ingly different.
                    of leading OECD countries, this article advo-  Why are digital inequalities a problem?
                    cates a global and comparative perspective  Are there not more urgent concerns in coun-
                    that takes into account the experiences and  tries in which basic needs for clean drinking
                    conditions of both center and periphery. The  water, nutrition, sanitation, shelter, health,
                    restructuring of communicative relations is  and basic education are not met? Is not the
                    global, though not globally uniform. The tra-  diffusion of new technologies just a matter of
                    jectories of regulation, usage, and impact of  the time it takes to trickle down to the late-
                    the NICT vary widely between world      comers? The problem we are witnessing is a
                    regions, across and within countries. Current  widening of the gap between those who are
                    trends point to very unequal chances for par-  well-off and those who are marginalized and
                    ticipating in the emerging network structures  excluded. Those who can connect to cyber-
                    and public spheres of incipient global civil  space can use it for their social, economic,
                    society (Castells, 1996; Sassen, 1997;  and political benefit. Let me illustrate the
                    Schulz, 2001a; Wellman, 1999). The modes  potential importance of access to NICT for
                    of NICT implementation and regulation at  marginalized groups with two examples. In
                    national and global levels have a decisive  the perhaps most famous case, the Zapatista
                    impact upon the distribution of access  rebels in Chiapas gained world-wide attention
   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329