Page 432 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 432

9781412934633-Chap-27  1/10/09  8:57 AM  Page 403





                                         THE DYNAMICS OF LOCAL-GLOBAL RELATIONS              403


                      Globalization as development embraces   Local-global conflicts from intrusions
                    world prosperity rather than the total success  where the global invades the local with nov-
                    of some over others.  The global, however,  elty, more rapid processes of change, and
                    has emerged as the new and the modern,  with resources that redefine and influence
                    threatening traditional social orders based on  local positions of wealth and standing also
                    established patterns of belief and values. For  bring prospects for local prosperity and
                    some groups, the enemy is global, intruding  autonomy. Nonetheless, local resistance is
                    everywhere. For those attached to the global,  potentially violently destructive of the
                    the new institutions represent freedom and  global. Often the local resists or presses dif-
                    opportunity, just as ‘new’ nation-states offered  ferent priorities than the global.  Although
                    an alternative to the restraints and limits of the  local conflicts with the global can escalate to
                    local or control by aliens from other cultures.  violence, they often appear only symboli-
                      Relationships across levels of human  cally in demonstrations.  The other side of
                    organization are inherently conflictual. First,  global intrusions, especially when they are
                    the higher level always has more variety than  invited by local groups, are additions of vari-
                    any unit does at a lower level. It has all the  ety to the locality as well as connections to
                    variety of any unit plus that of all other units.  alternative, higher level systems that allow
                    The probability of higher levels of aggregation  the locality to bypass the controls of regions
                    yielding new types of diversity is greater than  and states. In the coming decades, local
                    that of lower level units with less variety   conflicts with higher levels are likely to be
                    combining into something different. Higher  focused on the global, with the local attempt-
                    levels are also bigger and more powerful and  ing to enlist national authorities to help in
                    can absorb lower levels. The main cities in a  resisting global intrusions.
                    region, as centers of variety, have historically  In sum, the transcendent dynamic of local-
                    functioned as centers of innovation. Second,  global relations as a source of conflict is the
                    because higher levels have a greater capacity  evolution of social (human) systems, incor-
                    simply to absorb variety from others, their rate  porating the ‘classical’ ecological dynamics
                    of change is faster. The more variety a system  of competition and conflict into processes
                    has, the less disturbing is any novelty because  that tie globalization to developmental
                    it is a small percentage of the total. Higher  processes. Globalization is a process that is
                    levels seek to absorb the local by processes of  inclusive of all diversity through the integra-
                    incorporation, often resisted by the lower  tion of social, political and economic sys-
                                                                2
                    levels. Conflicts between a higher level center  tems. This process differs from that of
                    and lower level localities are aggravated by  empires, where populations are subordinated
                    the spatial distances that carry a history of  to a center in limited ways, but generally
                    conflicts between the center and the periphery.  left autonomous in the pursuit of their own
                    As the lower levels adapt to change, they are  culture.
                    confronted with more change from higher   During the past quarter of a century or so,
                    levels and, as noted, at an accelerating rate.  development has shifted from the national to
                    Nation-states have been established in almost  the global (Teune and Mlinar, 2000). For
                    all parts of the world except those that are  over two centuries the state, with its varied
                    least developed economically. Most of those  political economies, exercised hierarchal
                    areas today have institutionalized processes  control from a center which was justified by
                    whereby local and national differences can be  economic growth and social justice and a dif-
                    resolved whether in regional governments,  ferent, often new, overriding political identity.
                    new forms of decentralization, or negotiated  The state is, however, unlikely to regain its
                    economic distributions. For the time being, at  role as the main engine of economic growth
                    least in most countries, the worst of national  and integration of small units into larger
                    conflicts with the local have been smoothed.  systems.  Although the state may control
   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437