Page 465 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 465

9781412934633-Chap-29  1/12/09  4:20 PM  Page 436





                   436               THE ISA HANDBOOK IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY


                   On the one hand, the federal government   interpretation in her section of this chapter.)
                   created the International Network on Cultural  This subject is raised to protect against ‘glob-
                   Policy (INCP) in 1998 which, by 2003,   alization’ and its anticipated effects of
                   brought together 68 ministers from around  homogenization.  Therefore, discourse on
                   the world, each with responsibility for   diversity is constructed on feared power rela-
                   cultural policies.                      tionships, whose effects are worrisome, both
                     On the other hand, Québec was closely  in terms of identity and in terms of economics.
                   associated with negotiations on the Interna-  Throughout the corpus, the ‘United States’
                   tional  Instrument on Cultural Diversity  constitutes the spectre of globalization and is
                        6
                   (IICD) that resulted in the adoption of the  seen as the home of the feared cultural homog-
                   Convention on the Protection and Promotion  enization. Doubtless, the discourse about
                   of Diversity of Cultural Expressions on  the recognition of  global cultural diversity
                   October 20, 2005, during the 33rd session of  would not be experiencing the same growth
                   the General Conference of UNESCO.       were it not for this dread of a worldwide
                     My reflections are based on a comparative  American cultural homogenization which is
                   analysis of three distinct corpuses of institu-  promoted by commercial hegemony.
                   tional discourse about culture: (1) all of the  The ‘fundamental issue of cultural diver-
                   seven official policies on culture produced in  sity’ in the field of cultural policies is explic-
                   Québec from 1961 to 2000 (see Pietrantonio,  itly presented as the protection of the identity
                   2002); (2) the weekly press releases of the  of peoples from ‘commercialization’. 10
                   Bureau de la diversité culturelle (Office of  Throughout this ‘dossier on cultural diver-
                   Cultural Diversity, BDC), which became, in  sity’, it is a question of promoting nations’
                   mid-May 2004, the Secrétariat gouverne-  distinctive characters. In the three corpuses
                   mental à la diversité culturelle (Government  examined the  unit of meaning of cultural
                                              7
                   Secretariat for Cultural Diversity) (for 2000  diversity is, for the most part, based on the
                   and the period from 2003 to 2004) – this unit  idea of a cultural homogeneity of nations
                   has, in fact, operated the Internet site for the  which enable nations to differentiate them-
                   Ministère de la culture et de communications  selves from one another. In other words,
                   du Québec (Québec Ministry of Culture   diversity is mainly used in the sense of
                   and Communications) since January 2000; 8  promoting national cultures, which are, how-
                   and, finally, (3) the annual reports of the  ever, assumed to be ethnically homogeneous.
                   International Network on Cultural Policy  This entails a new register in the institutional
                          9
                   (INCP), a network in which Canada contin-  usage of the concept of diversity. However, in
                   ues to play an important role, after having  the case of the INCP, the discourse on the
                   initiated it. It has held an annual conference  protection of national culture seems con-
                   since its inception in 1998 and is undergoing  comitant with the need to take account of
                   some expansion since only 40 countries were  intra-national cultural diversity, which
                   members in 2001. In each of these three cor-  strongly distinguishes this corpus from the
                   puses, the discourse on culture is constructed  other two. In Québec, such a new usage of
                   in relation to an international reference point.  the notion of diversity in the wake of global-
                   Indeed, we could say that this has also been  ization takes little account of intra-national
                   the case for cultural policies in Québec since  ethnic diversity. Intra-group ethnic diversity,
                   they were first developed during the 1960s.  in terms of categories based on social class,
                     Thus, we can argue that since 1998, in  gender, age, etc., is, in fact, ignored in the
                   institutional milieus dealing with culture, it  whole corpus, except for what constitutes
                   has been the question of regulating global  Québec’s cultural policy of 1978. 11
                   commerce and trade that has permitted the  It is worth mentioning that until very
                   international deployment of the discourse   recently; i.e., less than 10 years ago, in both
                   on  diversity. (Denis presents a similar   Canada and Québec, the concept of diversity
   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470