Page 90 - The ISA Handbook in Contemporary Sociology
P. 90

9781412934633-Chap-05  1/10/09  10:21 AM  Page 61





                                         LAW THROUGH SOCIOLOGY’S LOOKING GLASS                61


                      If we describe jurisprudence as the theo-  methods which are unique to the “science of
                    retical wing of law, then doctrinal studies of  law”’, and believe that ‘legal developments
                    law, or ‘black letter scholarship’, becomes its  can be interpreted, critiqued, and validated by
                    pragmatic academic wing. The ‘conventional  reference to the internal logic of this sealed
                    legal approach to the law is all about   system’ (Vick, 2004: 178–9). In short, doctri-
                    doctrine’ which represents the standards or  nal studies use their own method of reasoning
                    principles which ‘can generate outcomes in  and analysis to collect the specific rules
                    conventional disputes independent of the  and decisions of the existing legal system,
                    political or economic ideology of judges’  reduce them to their essential statements of
                                            3
                    (Tiller and Cross, 2006: 518). A basis for a  rules and exceptions, systematize them and,
                    doctrine is laid when a court outlines a spe-  at times might even evaluate them. Sources
                    cific framework, set of rules, procedures and  from which they collect their raw material are
                    other legal techniques to decide a case. The  limited to ‘a finite and relatively fixed
                    doctrine becomes established once other  universe of authoritative texts’ such as
                    courts follow the same procedure and form  statutes, legal opinions and legal cases (Vick,
                    of reasoning to decide similar cases.  This  2004: 178).
                    type of reasoning requires an understanding  Legal knowledge produced through the
                    of substantive rules, their origins (legal  exegesis of legal texts is, admittedly, of a
                    sources), how they have developed over time,  special kind, but its esoteric character should
                    their scope and underlying policy. It can also  not conceal its social nature. Forms of
                    require an analysis of the relationship  knowledge and ‘truth’ that law produces are
                    between the rules within the same substan-  dependent on communicative processes
                    tive category of law and how these overlap  which are inherently social and fall within
                    with other legal categories. The role of the  the scope of social theory. As pointed out by
                    doctrinal researcher is to examine ‘the con-  Cotterrell, law has no ‘truth’ of its own and
                    tent of legal opinion to evaluate whether it  sociology is in principle capable of grasping
                    was effectively reasoned or to explore its  the essence of legal doctrine and providing it
                    implications for future cases’ (Tiller and  with a form of insight which is ‘not only
                    Cross, 2006: 518).                      useful but  necessary for legal studies’
                      In contrast to their counterparts in other  (Cotterrell, 2006: 45).  Why sociological
                    disciplines such as sociology, doctrinal  ideas are not adopted to enrich doctrinal
                    scholars ‘do not usually “produce” new  analysis is another matter which will be
                    knowledge’ and what they produce is often  addressed in Part Three.
                    parasitical upon the work which has already  Legal doctrine sets the normative context
                    been done by others (Vick, 2004: 177).  in which lawyers acquire their ‘juridical
                    Doctrinal studies use jurisprudence, legal  gaze’, i.e., it sets the backdrop against which
                    history and comparative law as auxiliary  they learn to identify relevant questions and
                    sources of knowledge or tools of analysis.  to read and criticize legal texts by paying
                    Although a large part of such studies remain  close attention to textual contexts, while
                    descriptive, black letter lawyers can, and do,  avoiding the broader social and political
                                                                                    4
                    engage in prescriptive work which aims   contexts of legal arguments. ‘A question
                    to influence the developmental direction   which cannot be legitimately answered by
                    of the law. Yet, they often shy away from  reference to a statute or judgment lies outside
                    social theorizing or addressing the broader  the doctrinal gaze’ (Bradney, 1998:76).
                    societal issues which arise out of legal prac-  However, knowledge of legal rules and doc-
                    tice, legal doctrine or legal developments.  trine does not by itself provide a sufficient
                    This is in part because they treat the law ‘as  basis for legal practice. Much of lawyers’
                    a sealed system which can be studied through  day-to-day work  concerns dealing with
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95