Page 37 - John Kador - 301 Best Questions to Ask on Your Interview, Second Edition-McGraw-Hill (2010)
P. 37

THE RULES OF THE GAME

        In tactical terms, that means framing your interview questions so
        the answers you want or expect will be positive. Here’s an example of
        an exchange between a candidate and an interviewer to demonstrate
        the power of yes.

        CANDIDATE: I have long been impressed by Acme Widgets. It’s been

           the leader in pneumatic widgets for more than fifty years, right?
        INTERVIEWER [PROUDLY]: Yes!
        CANDIDATE: I noticed in the current annual report that the company
           sets aside $50 million, or 2.5 percent of revenues, for research and
           development. That’s more than all of your competitors, right?
        INTERVIEWER: Yes. We lead the industry in allocation of R&D by
           revenue.
        CANDIDATE: As the market for widgets gets more commoditized,
           we will have to differentiate the product, right? What specifi cally
           is the company doing to preserve the market share it has gained
           over the years?

        As the interviewer answers the question, note the subtle messages the
        candidate is sending. The candidate ends each question with “right?”
        which invites the interviewer to answer with “yes.” Of course, the
        candidate must be on sure ground. The candidate certainly wants to
        avoid any possibility that the interviewer will answer, “No, that’s not
        quite right.” Good research makes such questioning possible.


        5. Use Inclusive Language

        Look at the last dialogue again. Did you notice that the candidate sub-
        tly shifted from you to we? Words such as we and our subtly give the
        impression that the candidate is already a member of the team. The
        more comfortable the interviewer is with the concept of the candidate
        already being on the team, the better the candidate’s chances. It’s so
        much easier extending a job offer to someone whom the interviewer
        on some level already perceives as part of “us” instead of “them.”
          The risk, of course, is to come off as presumptuous. So a delicate
        touch with this technique is warranted. Generally, it works best later
        in the interview and after the interviewer has demonstrated a sub-

                                      16
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42