Page 42 - 3D Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites
P. 42

Manufacture of 30 Fibre Preforms                    31

            2.3.4 Multilayer Interlock Braiding
            A different class of three-dimensional braiding does not rely upon the 2-step and 4-step
            processes previously described, and is considered to be closer to the traditional process
            of 2D braiding in  its operation.  This proprietary braiding process, called “multilayer
            interlock  braiding”,  was  developed  at  Albany  International  Research  Corporation
            (Brookstein, 1991; Brookstein et al., 1993) and the machinery is analogous to a number
            of standard circular braiders being joined together to form a cylindrical braiding frame.
            This  frame has a  number of parallel braiding tracks around the circumference of  the
            cylinder but the mechanism allows the transfer of yarn carriers between adjacent tracks
            thus forming a  multilayer braided  fabric with  yarns  interlocking adjacent  layers (see
            Figure 2.20).  The multilayer interlock braid  differs from both  the 4-step  and 2-step
            braids in that the interlocking yarns are primarily in the plane of the structure and thus
            do not significantly reduce the in-plane properties of the preform.  The 4-step and 2-step
            processes produce a greater degree of  interlinking as the braiding yarns travel through
            the thickness of the preform, but therefore contribute less to the in-plane performance of
            the preform.




















                                                           Axials


            Figure 2.20 Schematic of the multilayer interlock braiding process


            A disadvantage of  the multilayer interlock equipment is that due to the conventional
            sinusoidal movement of the yarn carriers to form the preform, the equipment is not able
            to have the density of yarn carriers that is possible with the 2-step and 4-step machines.
            The consequence of  this is that multilayer interlock braiders will be larger than 2-step
            and 4-step machines for a comparable number of carriers and are considered to be less
            versatile  in  the  range  of  preform  architectures produced  (Kostar  and  Chou,  1999).
            However the  use  of  the  traditional  horn  gear  mechanisms offers  improved braiding
            speed over the 2-step and 4-step processes.
               There are a number of  disadvantages with  all the 3D braiding processes described
            here (Kostar and Chou, 1999). Firstly, compared to other textile processes, braiding can
            only  make  preforms of  small  scale relative to  the size of  the  machinery.  Also,  the
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47