Page 95 - 3D Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites
P. 95

84                  30 Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites
                 Replacing the iso-strain assumption with an iso-stress assumption throughout the unit
                 cell, we can find the effective compliance matrix as follows:
                                                              1
                               IISw(y)]dV+ I[S'(x)]dV+ /[S"]dV                     (4.41)
                                           Vf         vm

                 In the iso-stress assumption, it is assumed that the stresses are uniform throughout the
                 unit  cell  when  subject  to  a  homogeneous  boundary  condition  of  constant  surface
                 tractions as defined in equation (4.9).  Similarly, a set of closed form expressions for the
                 effective compliance constants can be obtained.
                    The 3D fabric geometry model, initially developed by KO and Chou (1989) to study
                 the  compressive  behaviour  of  braided  metal-matrix  composites,  was  used  by
                 Vandeurzen et a1  (1996a,  1996b and  1998) to develop 3D elastic models for woven
                 fabric  composites.  In  the  fabric  geometry  model,  different  yarn  systems  in  a
                 macroscopic unit  cell  are  defined according to  the  yam  orientation, and  each  yarn
                 system is treated as a unidirectional lamina.  By assuming that all yam systems have the
                 same strains, i.e., introducing an iso-strain condition in all yarns, the effective stiffness
                 matrix of the composite unit cell can be calculated as the weighted sum of the stiffness
                 matrices of all the yarn systems.  Vandeurzen et a1  (1996a,b) carried out an extensive
                 geometric analysis of  woven  fabric composites, and  then  established a  macro-  and
                 micro-partition  procedure to  describe even  the  most  complex 2D  woven  composite
                 structures, with  a  library of  108 rectangular macro-cells and  a  library of  geometric
                 parameters. The procedure allows definition of the yarn systems in, generally speaking,
                 two ways of  micro-partition, as schematically shown in Figure 4.9.  In the non-mixed
                 yam system, the yarn and matrix are modelled separately with the yarns being further
                 partitioned into micro-cells to describe the yarn undulation.  In the mixed yarn system,
                 both yam and matrix are partitioned together to form rectangular micro-cells of mixed
                 yarn  system.  In  the  mixed  yarn  system, fibres of  the  yarn  are redistributed evenly
                 throughout the entire micro-cell with an averaged fibre volume fraction.



















                                (a) Non-mixed                   (b) Mixed
                  Figure 4.9  Two ways of creating yarn  systems (a) non-mixed yarn  systems and  (b)
                 mixed yam systems (Vandeurzen et al, 1996a,b)
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100