Page 92 - 3D Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites
P. 92

Micromechanics Models for Mechanical Properties      81
            axes can be determined using transformed equations similar to those given in (4.30) and
            (4.3 1).
               As proposed by Naik and Ganesh (1992), with reference to Figure 4.7(b) and (c), for
            the  warp  yam in one slice the off-axis angle at the midpoint of  that  slice is used  to
            calculate the off-axis compliance constants for the idealised warp layer, while for the
            weft yarn in one slice the off-axis effective compliance constants for the idealised weft
            layer are set to equal to the average values of Sij( 6J over the integration interval from 0
            to the maximum values of  I%&).  With the compliance constants known for each layer
            in  one idealised  slice in  Figure 4.7(c),  the effective properties for that  slice can be
            determined using the classical laminate theory. Similar to the case of one-dimensional
            fibre undulation model, the overall effective properties for the unit cell shown in Figure
            4.7(a) can be determined by applying iso-stress conditions to all slices in y direction.
               Evidently, determination of the off-axis compliance constants in the weft  yarn  in
            terms of average values of Sij( 8, introduces approximations.  Another model, proposed
            by Naik and Ganesh (1992) and referred to as the element array model, was to enhance
            the approximation in the weft direction.  In the element array model, the slices of the
            unit cell shown in Figure 4.7(b) were further divided into elements along the x direction
            prior to idealisation.  This can be better illustrated in Figure 4.8, in which the unit cell is
            discretised along both warp and weft directions into elements. For each element the off-
            axis angles at the centre of the element are chosen to determine the reduced properties
            of  the  idealised  layers, which can be  further used  to calculate the properties of  that
            element using the classical laminate theory.  The overall effective properties of the unit
            cell can be obtained by assembling all elements in two combinations, i.e.,  series-parallel
            combination  and  parallel-series  combination.  In  the  series-parallel  combination,
            elements are assembled in series into slices first along the loading direction under iso-
            stress condition and then the slices are considered in parallel under iso-strain condition.
            In  the  parallel-series combination, elements are  grouped  in  parallel into  slices first
            across  the  loading  direction  under  an  iso-strain  condition  and  then  the  slices  are
            considered in series under an iso-stress condition.  It is expected that the parallel-series
            combination  predict  a  higher  value  of  stiffness  compared  to  the  series-parallel
            combination.
               Naik and his colleagues have performed an extensive research both numerically and
            experimentally to verify the slices array model and element array model (Naik, 1994).
            Shembekar  and  Naik  (1992)  also  investigated  the  effect  of  fibre  undulation  shifts
            between individual weave lamina in a laminated plate.  It is beyond the scope and limit
            of  this  chapter.  Readers who  require  further details on  the  models themselves and
            experimental verificatiofare referred to the book by Naik (1994).


            4.3.3 Three-Dimensional (3D) Models
            Both  1D  and  2D  models  discussed  above  were  developed based  on  the  classical
            laminate theory.  Although  accounting for  yarn  undulation, yarn  shape and  spacing,
            these  models  predict  the  in-plane  elastic  properties  only.  3D  models  have  been
            developed  to  evaluate  the  out-of-plane elastic  properties  in  addition  to  the  in-plane
            properties.  It  is  not  possible to  present all  models.  In  the following we  choose to
            present the models proposed by Hahn and Pandey (1994) and Vandeurzen et al. (1996a,
            1996b, 1998) for the case of plain weave composites.
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97