Page 129 - A First Course In Stochastic Models
P. 129

THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS                   121

                would be a positive probability of never returning to state r, contradicting the fact
                                                                         (v)
                that state r is recurrent. Hence there is a positive integer v such that p sr > 0. For
                any integer k,
                                         (v+k+1)  (v) (k)
                                       p       ≥ p   p  p rs ,
                                         ss       sr  rr
                            
 ∞   (n)    (v)  
 ∞   (k)
                implying that  n=1  p ss ≥ p sr p rs  k=1  p rr . Since state r is recurrent, it now
                follows from Lemma 3.5.1 that state s is recurrent. Hence s ∈ R.
                  (b) We first observe that the following two properties hold:
                  (P1) If state i communicates with state j and state i communicates with state k,
                then the states j and k communicate.
                  (P2) If state j is recurrent and state k is accessible from state j, then state j is
                accessible from state k.
                  The first property is obvious. The second property was in fact proved in part (a).
                Define now for each i ∈ R the set C(i) as the set of all states j that communicate
                with state i. The set C(i) is not empty since i communicates with itself by definition.
                Further, by part (a), C(i) ⊆ R. To prove that the set C(i) is closed, let j ∈ C(i)
                and let k be any state with p jk > 0. Then we must verify that i → k and k → i.
                From i → j and j → k it follows that i → k. Since j → i, the relation k → i
                follows when we can verify that k → j. The relation k → j follows directly
                from property P2, since j is recurrent by the proof of part (a) of Theorem 3.5.3.
                Moreover, the foregoing arguments show that any two states in C(i) communicate.
                It now follows from Lemma 3.5.2 that C(i) is an irreducible set. Also, using the
                properties P1 and P2, it is readily verified that C(i) = C(j) if i and j communicate
                and that C(i) ∩ C(j) is empty otherwise. This completes the proof of part (b).
                Definition 3.5.2 Let i be a recurrent state. The period of state i is said to be d if
                                                                     (n)
                d is the greatest common divisor of the indices n ≥ 1 for which p  > 0. A state i
                                                                     ii
                with period d = 1 is said to be aperiodic.
                Lemma 3.5.5 (a) Let C be an irreducible set consisting of recurrent states. Then
                all states in C have the same period.
                                                                       (n)
                  (b) If state i is aperiodic, then there is an integer n 0 such that p  > 0 for all
                                                                       ii
                n ≥ n 0 .
                Proof  (a) Denote by d(k) the period of state k ∈ C. Choose i, j ∈ C with j  = i.
                By Lemma 3.5.2 we have i → j and j → i. Hence there are integers v, w ≥ 1
                         (v)        (w)                                 (n)
                such that p  > 0 and p  > 0. Let n be any positive integer with p  > 0. Then
                         ij         ji                                  jj
                                                  (n+v+w)
                the first inequality in (3.5.1) implies that p  > 0 and so n+v+w is divisible
                                                  ii
                                                                  (n)
                by d(i). Thus we find that n is divisible by d(i) whenever p  > 0. This implies
                                                                  jj
                that d(i) ≤ d(j). For reasons of symmetry, d(j) ≤ d(i). Hence d(i) = d(j) which
                verifies part (a).
                                      (n)
                  (b) Let A = {n ≥ 1 | p  > 0}. The index set A is closed in the sense that
                                      ii
                                                               (n+m)   (n) (m)
                n + m ∈ A when n ∈ A and m ∈ A. This follows from p  ≥ p  p  . Since
                                                               ii      ii  ii
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134