Page 73 - A First Course In Stochastic Models
P. 73

64                    RENEWAL-REWARD PROCESSES


                       ∗       ∞ −sx
                where b (s) =    e  b(x) dx denotes the Laplace transform of the probabil-
                              0
                ity density b(x) of the service time. To prove this, note that D n , S n and τ n are
                independent of each other. This implies that, for any x > 0,

                            −s(D n +S n −τ n ) +
                         E e            | D n + S n = x
                                  x                   ∞
                                   −s(x−y)  −λy         −s×0  −λy
                             =    e      λe    dy +    e    λe   dy
                                0                   x
                                 λ    −sx   −λx    −λx     1    −sx    −λx
                             =      (e   − e   ) + e  =       (λe   − se  )
                               λ − s                     λ − s
                for s 
= λ (using L’Hospital’s rule it can be seen that this relation also holds for
                s = λ). Hence, using (2.5.10),

                         (λ − s)E e −sD n+1  = λE e −s(D n +S n )  − sE e −λ(D n +S n )  .

                                    +
                Since P {(D n + S n − τ n ) = 0 | D n + S n = x} = e −λx , we also have

                                    P {D n+1 = 0} = E e −λ(D n +S n )  .

                                           −s(D n +S n )
                The latter two relations and E e   = E e −sD n  E e −sS n  lead to (2.5.11).
                The steady-state waiting-time distribution function W q (x) is defined by
                                  W q (x) = lim P {D n ≤ x},  x ≥ 0.
                                          n→∞
                The existence of this limit can be proved from Theorem 2.2.4. Let the random vari-
                able D ∞ have W q (x) as probability distribution function. Then, by the bounded con-
                vergence theorem in Appendix A, E(e  −sD ∞ ) = lim n→∞ E(e −sD n ). Using (2.5.6), it
                follows from lim n→∞ P {D n+1 = 0} = π 0 and q 0 = 1 − ρ that lim n→∞ P {D n+1 =
                0} = 1 − ρ. Letting n → ∞ in (2.5.11), we find that

                                                    (1 − ρ)s

                                     E e −sD ∞  =            .              (2.5.12)
                                                 s − λ + λb (s)
                                                          ∗
                Noting that P {D ∞ ≤ x} = W q (x) and using relation (E.7) in Appendix E, we get
                from (2.5.12) the desired result:
                               ∞                      ρs − λ + λb (s)

                                                                 ∗
                                 e −sx  1 − W q (x) dx =             .      (2.5.13)
                                                                ∗
                              0                       s(s − λ + λb (s))
                Taking the derivative of the right-hand side of (2.5.13) and putting s = 0, we obtain
                                                            2
                                     ∞
                                                        λE(S )
                                        1 − W q (x) dx =       ,
                                    0                  2(1 − ρ)
                in agreement with the Pollaczek–Khintchine formula (2.5.1).
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78