Page 126 - Hybrid Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Smart Waterflooding
P. 126

118     Hybrid Enhanced Oil Recovery using Smart Waterflooding



          CA [L]  133.6                         CA [L]  36.1
                                                                        CA [L]  31.2
          CA [R]  133.6                         CA [R]  36.1
                                                                        CA [R]  31.2


                                      SW




                                                                SW+CO 2
                                                                                           LS +CO 2
                                                                                             1
                                                                        CA [L]  46.5
            CA [L]  94.6
                                          CA [L]  60.0                  CA [R]  46.5
            CA [R]  94.6
                                          CA [R]  60.0




                                    SW
                                                               SW+CO 2                     LS +CO 2
                                                                                             1
          CA [L]  116.6
                                             CA [L]  40.8
          CA [R]  116.6                                                 CA [L]  36.6
                                             CA [R]  40.8               CA [R]  36.6




                                       SW

                                                               SW+CO 2
                                                                                           LS +CO 2
                                                                                             1
                FIG. 5.3 The contact angle of the system of crude oil/mixture fluid of brine and CO 2 /rock varying brine and
                rock types. (Credit: From Teklu, T. W., Alameri, W., Graves, R. M., Kazemi, H., & AlSumaiti, A. M. (2016). Low-
                salinity water-alternating-CO 2 EOR. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 142, 101e118. https://doi.
                org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.01.031.)

          by 7.1% and 5.6% over the secondary waterflood  has another advantage to reduce the IFT between
          recovery. The miscible CO 2 injection process enhances  oil and brine. The experimental study obviously demon-
          the oil recovery by 14.2% and 25% over the recovery  strated that the LS-CO 2 WAG process can secure the both
          of the LSWF, respectively. The third set of coreflooding  mechanisms of LSWF and miscible/immiscible CO 2
          using sandstone core is performed at immiscible condi-  injection.
          tion. The LSWF increases the oil recovery by 7.7% over  Ramanathan, Shehata, and Nasr-El-Din (2015)
          the secondary waterflood. The CO 2 injection signifi-  quantified the effect of salinity-dependent CO 2 solubility
          cantly produces more oil by 38.5% than LSWF. In  on the immiscible CO 2 WAG process through the
          conclusion, the LS-CO 2 WAG is effective to improve  contact angle measurements and coreflooding experi-
          the oil recovery by IFT reduction and wettability modifi-  ments. The captive bubble method measures the contact
          cation. The additions of CO 2 and low-salinity water are  angle in the two different systems of crude oil/Berea
          effective to change both the carbonates and sandstones  sandstone/brine and crude oil/Berea sandstone/brine/
          toward hydrophilic conditions. The addition of CO 2  CO 2 . The aged and unaged cores are investigated to
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131