Page 127 - Hybrid Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Smart Waterflooding
P. 127

CHAPTER 5   Hybrid CO 2 EOR Using Low-Salinity and Smart Waterflood  119


          analyze the effect of initial wetness. Three different brines  also implies no formation damage of fines migration,
          include the formation brine of 174,156 ppm TDS,  precipitation, or plugging. Secondly, the immiscible
          seawater of 54,680 ppm TDS, and NaCl brine of  CO 2 WAG processes using seawater and low-salinity
          5000 ppm TDS as low-salinity water. In the system of  water are investigated (Fig. 5.4). The coreflooding of
          crude oil/sandstone/brine, the low-salinity water shows  CO 2 WAG process uses only unaged core, which screens
          the lowest contact angle and seawater shows the highest  out the wettability modification effect of LSWF. In the
          contact angle for both aged and unaged cores. During the  comparison between conventional CO 2 WAG using
          measurement, the temperature of the system is increased  seawater and LS-CO 2 WAG processes, conventional
          to examine the effect of temperature on the contact  CO 2 WAG shows the slightly higher oil recovery
          angle. The higher contact angle with an increase in  over the LS-CO 2 WAG. It is explained that the slight
          temperature is observed. Interestingly, the formation  increment by 2.93% is attributed to the salting-out
          water condition has lower contact angle than the  effect, which is similar to the observations of Jiang
          seawater despite higher salinity, i.e., the less water-  et al. (2010). The higher solubility of CO 2 in low-
          wetness in formation water condition than seawater  salinity water results in the less contact between oil
          condition. It is explained that the seawater, which has  and CO 2 . The less contact leads to the less contribution
          the relatively higher fraction of divalent cations  of immiscible mechanism of CO 2 injection on the oil
          compared with formation water, results in the bridging  production. The fluctuating pressure drop is observed
          between the anionic surfactant, i.e., negative polar  during the period of CO 2 injection for both conven-
          component, of crude oil and the significant amount of  tional CO 2 WAG and LS-CO 2 WAG processes. It is
          divalent cations on the rock surface. Another experiment  estimated to the result of CO 2 dissolution in water.
          measures a dynamic contact angle in the system of crude  This study clearly confirmed the effect of salinity-
          oil/brine/CO 2 /unaged rock for 24 h. Because of the  dependent CO 2 solubility on the performance of
          interactions between oil and CO 2 , and oil and brine,  LS-CO 2 WAG process in water-wet system. Because
          the measured contact angle has some fluctuations. After  this study lacks the investigation of LS-CO 2 WAG
          some time to be stabilized, the consistent tendency  process using oil-wet cores, it is not clarified whether
          between contact angle and brine type is similar to the  LS-CO 2 WAG process secures the mechanism of LSWF
          previous measurements. The results of contact angle  or not.
          measurements indicate that low-salinity water results in  Ramanathan, Shehata, and Nasr-El-Din (2016)
          the more water-wet rock samples. The seawater brine  reported the further investigations of CO 2 WAG process
          shows the more oil-wet rock samples in both systems  with various brine types. The axisymmetric drop shape
          representing waterflood and CO 2 WAG process.  analysis measures the IFT of the brine/crude oil/N 2
            In a number of coreflooding experiments, the  and brine/crude oil/CO 2 systems. The same brines of
          secondary CO 2 WAG processes and waterflood using  formation brine, seawater, and low-salinity water are
          low-salinity water and seawater are analyzed. The exper-  prepared. It is clearly measured that high-salinity brine
          iments also use both the aged and unaged cores to  shows the higher density, and higher temperature de-
          investigate the effect of initial wetness. Firstly, the  creases the density of brine. In the system of brine/crude
          conventional waterflood using seawater and LSWF are  oil/N 2 , the equilibrium IFT is measured at various
          investigated, considering the initial wetness of cores.  temperature and immiscible conditions. The low-
          In the system of unaged core, the effect of LSWF is  salinity water shows the highest IFT and seawater results
          hardly observed. Instead, a slight higher oil recovery is  in lowest IFT regardless of temperature condition.
          observed in conventional waterflood compared with  Because the effect of monovalent ions on interfacial
          the LSWF. In the system of aged core, which is initially  activity between oil and water is weak and interfacial
          more oil-wet condition, the higher oil recovery by 14%  active substances are oil-soluble, it is not able to
          is observed for the LSWF than the conventional water-  influence the interfacial interactions (Bai, Fan, Nan, Li,
          flood. In addition, the LSWF produces the significantly  & Bao-Shi, 2010). The effect of temperature on the IFT
          higher oil recovery in aged core system than unaged  shows a similar trend of increasing IFT with an increase
          core system. However, the conventional waterflood  in temperature. Referring the experiments of Hjelme-
          shows the insignificant change of oil recovery between  land and Larrondo (1986), there will be a lower concen-
          both systems. These observations are in line with the  tration of the surface-active components at the brine/oil
          results of contact angle measurement. It is obvious  interface at higher temperatures. As a result, higher tem-
          that the LSWF is effective to modify the wettability of  perature condition might contribute to the higher IFT.
          oil-wet rock system. The measured pressure drop  The dynamic interfacial tension is measured in the
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132