Page 187 - Adsorption Technology & Design, Elsevier (1998)
P. 187

Design procedures  173


            Table 6.5  Factors for modifying the BDST equation*
                                     i      i  ll|,,
                                     Required removal of adsorbable impurities (%)
            Factor                  50     60      70     80     90     95
                                       i   i   i   l  lll             i   ill
            Moving bed factors,
              pulsing 5% of bed    0.51   0.41   0.31    0.21   0.107   0.054
            Series of factors for
              number of columns
            2                      0.70   0.63   0.54    0.44   0.31   0.22
            3
                                   0.59   0.50   0.40    0.30   0.18   0.11
            4
                                   0.56   0.46   0.37    0.26   0.144   0.080
            5
                                   0.55   0.44   0.35    0.24   0.133   0.072
            ,,,,,   ,,   ,,,   ,   ,   ,
                                  i   ill   i   i   i   iii   i   i   i   i   i
            * From Faust and Aly (1987)
            The BDST equation has no value if the column feed is not representative of
            the  normal  plant  system.  Thus,  as  with  any  other  form  of  small-scale
            experimentation, it is important that actual feedstocks are used in the tests.
            For the most accurate  results, the MTZ should move through the column at
            a constant  rate  and so a constant  pattern  MTZ,  a constant  feed concentra-
            tion and a constant feed flowrate are all required.


            6.7.5
                   Transfer unit approach (NTU and HTU)
            The transfer unit concept described in Section 6.3 for differential continuous
            contacting can be extended to the design of fixed beds which operate with a
            constant  pattern  mass  transfer  zone.  A  fixed  bed  of  adsorbent  must  be
            sufficiently long not only to contain the MTZ but also to allow it a convenient
            residence  time.  In  the  transfer  unit  method  the  MTZ  is  brought  to  rest
            hypothetically by giving the adsorbent a velocity equal and opposite to that
            of  the  MTZ.  It  is  necessary  to  use  the  methods  described  earlier  in  this
            chapter  to  calculate  both  the  NTU  and  the  HTU  in  order  to estimate  the
            length of the MTZ. For the NTU, the concentrations cE and ca refer to those
            at  the  end  and  at  the  beginning  of  the  MTZ.  The  overall  mass  transfer
            coefficient  must  be  calculated  by  taking  all  relevant  film  coefficients  into
            account in order that the HTU may be calculated. The length of the MTZ is
            then the product of NTU  and HTU. Treybal (1955) describes in more detail
            how the transfer unit method can be used to plot the shape of the MTZ.

            6.7.6   Capacity at breakpoint
            The  capacity  at  the  breakthrough  point  is defined  as the  mass per  cent,  or
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192