Page 37 - Adsorption Technology & Design, Elsevier (1998)
P. 37

34  Fundamentals of adsorption equilibria






                                                        IV



            "0
            (1)
            -E
            o
                                                           r
            "1o
            r
            :3
            0
            E
            <
                                                  i
                        Ps           Ps          Ps
                                       Pressure,,,

            Figure 3.2  The five types of adsorption isotherm.

            capacity with increasing relative pressure. Type IV isotherms are similar to
            type  II  isotherms  except  that  adsorption  terminates  near  to  a  relative
            pressure  of unity. Type V  isotherms are similar to type III isotherms at low
            relative  pressure  but  then  a  point  of inflexion  is reached  and  a  saturation
            limit is approached as the relative pressure is further increased.
              It is not uncommon for isotherms of types II and IV to have a hysteresis
            loop. Above a relative pressure of about 0.2 many porous adsorbents desorb
            a  larger  quantity  of  vapour  at  a  given  relative  pressure  than  the  amount
            corresponding to adsorption. This is illustrated in Figure 3.3a. Everett (1958)
            showed that such hysteresis loops can provide useful information concerning
            the  geometric  shapes  of  pores  in  which  vapour  condensation  occurs.
            Without  entering  into  a  discourse  on  the  origin  and  causes  of  hysteresis
            loops, it suffices to say that the underlying reason why such a phenomenon
            occurs is the way liquid menisci form and disintegrate. When a liquid surface
            is concave to its own vapour in equilibrium with the liquid, Thompson (1871)
            showed  that  the  vapour  pressure  is  lower  than  it  would  be  if  the  liquid
            surface  were  planar.  This  becomes  a  significant  point  when  considering
            condensation of a vapour within narrow pores and capillaries. If/z0 and/z are
            the  chemical  potentials  of  the  vapour  above  a  plane  and  curved  surface,
            respectively,  Thompson  deduced,  using  a  thermodynamic  argument,  that
            the difference  amounted  to RgT In (ps/pa) where ps is the saturated  vapour
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42